lru-rs
carbon-lang
lru-rs | carbon-lang | |
---|---|---|
3 | 174 | |
590 | 32,216 | |
- | 0.4% | |
6.7 | 9.8 | |
2 months ago | 3 days ago | |
Rust | C++ | |
MIT License | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
lru-rs
-
“Rust is safe” is not some kind of absolute guarantee of code safety
For reference, the fix for https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2021-45720 was as simple as this commit: https://github.com/jeromefroe/lru-rs/commit/ea64c8f932a45434cbc71d3843d28af7c1819864.
-
How Safe Is Zig?
You didn't seem to click the commit the guy linked with the rust code https://github.com/jeromefroe/lru-rs/pull/121/commits/416a2d...
It has nothing to do with opting out. Zig, Rust and no language saves you when you write incorrect unsafe code. My original point is disqualifying c tools is misleading and everything suffers from incorrect unsafe code
carbon-lang
- Carbon Copy Newsletter No.2
-
Cpp2 and cppfront – An experimental 'C++ syntax 2' and its first compiler
The roadmap for Carbon [0] mentions wanting to have basic, non-trivial programs written in Carbon by the end of 2024. They're aiming for a v0.1 release in 2025. If it gains traction, they're aiming for a v1.0 beyond 2027.
I don't think anyone outside Google will seriously adopt this before it reaches v1.0. Even within Google, they may choose other options.
[0] - https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/blob/trunk/do...
- Carbon Language Newsletter, the Carbon Copy, February 2024
-
Odin Programming Language
Carbon was started by Chandler Carruth, at Google, but they wanted to move it to broader governance quickly. It's not under the Google GitHub today, but its own org.
https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/blob/trunk/do...
-
C++ Should Be C++
What do you think about Carbon[1]? I am hopeful.
[1] https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang
- The NSA advises move to memory-safe languages
- Carbon Language: An experimental successor to C++
-
Toward a TypeScript for C++"
https://github.com/carbon-language/carbon-lang/blob/trunk/do...
next year 0.1 will be usable, 1.0 is about 3 years away, sigh, back to my rust fight
-
Programming Languages Every Developer Should Watch Out For
1. Carbon
What are some alternatives?
zorrow - Borrowchecker in Zig
rust - Empowering everyone to build reliable and efficient software.
stable_deref_trait - Unsafe marker trait for types that deref to a stable address
crubit
tigerbeetle - A distributed financial accounting database designed for mission critical safety and performance. [Moved to: https://github.com/tigerbeetledb/tigerbeetle]
cppfront - A personal experimental C++ Syntax 2 -> Syntax 1 compiler
arm-trusted-firmware - Read-only mirror of Trusted Firmware-A
Odin - Odin Programming Language
go - The Go programming language
zig - General-purpose programming language and toolchain for maintaining robust, optimal, and reusable software.
hylo - The Hylo programming language