logs-benchmark VS SirTunnel

I am a maintainer at SigNoz. Nice to see OpenObserve's belief that the future of Observability should be OpenSource. We chose clickhouse rather than building a database as it takes multi-year effort to move a db to maturity and clickhouse has been battle-tested at Yandex, Uber and Cloudflare. Clickhouse also provides native integration with s3 and other blob storages. Our users have been using disk as hot storage for a week and moving the data to s3 after that. Tiered storage is really cool in terms of query performance.

We have also seen logs data of our users at a compression ratio of 30x/40x. We have published a logs benchmark (https://github.com/SigNoz/logs-benchmark) where the data is very high-cardinal (causing a compression factor of only 2.5x). Would love to see how does OpenObserve perform in that dataset someday.

Wishing you best for the journey ahead.

Did you update the benchmark after you got feedback from this user at Hacker News or after you got the feedback that including Loki here is kinda pointless?

If you want to self-host, there are many options. For something production ready frp is probably what you want. If you're a developer, I'd recommend starting with my own SirTunnel project and modifying it for your needs. For non-developers and those wanting more of a GUI experience, I created boringproxy. It's my take on a comprehensive tunnel proxy solution. It's in beta but currently solves almost everything I want. Once the server is running this is a very easy tool to use and has some nice features.

* Great examples which provided inspiration include Cloudflare tunnel, Tailscale Funnel, SirTunnel, Localhost.run, Fractual Mosaic, Pinggy, Tunll, and of course, the original Ngrok.

All you need is a cheap VPS with decent transfer allowance (RAM and CPU doesn't matter much) and this

Personally I'd recommend setting up a one-time ssh remote tunnel on a VPS. That's essentially what SirTunnel does. If that works, try adding Caddy in front of it to get auto-HTTPS.