ln VS imaginary

Yes ! I'm using ln, slowly adding textures to the default shapes it provides.

"ln is a vector-based 3D renderer written in Go. It is used to produce 2D vector graphics (think SVGs) depicting 3D scenes" quoted from the readme. It is rough as first, due to the 'light' documentation, but I found it is a good starting point to learn Go as a beginner :)

Thanks ! I wanted to use ln to generate 3D vector graphics, and used it as an excuse to learn a bit of Go. I'm slowly building an understanding of this lib, as well as some of go principles. For 2D plots, and 2D creative coding in general, I'm sticking with Python !

Check out Flogleman's "ln" line art render engine. It's perfect for plotters: https://github.com/fogleman/ln I think you could have a lot of fun with it!

This came from messing around with ln, a go graphics library.

WebP also frequently produces lower quality or blurry images: - https://wordpress.org/support/topic/images-going-blurry/ - https://github.com/h2non/imaginary/issues/240

One thing I didn't mention that AIO includes is a container called imaginary which is written in Go and processes images. I think this is mainly used here for generating image previews in NC.

Thanks. This is new to me. How is it different from https://github.com/h2non/imaginary?

There is also battle-tested imaginary tool [1], offering similar functionality and much more, also using libvips

[1] https://github.com/h2non/imaginary

Imaginary is a fast HTTP microservice written in Go allowing high-level image processing. Behind the scene, imaginary uses bimg and libvips libraries to perform the image manipulations.