list VS gecko-dev

perfect use case for the public suffix list (https://github.com/publicsuffix/list)

I just made up `blogger.com` as an example. I probably could have picked a better one. `blogspot.com` & its many TLD variations are on the list.

It looks like the repo where the list is maintained [1] is pretty active. YMMV, I'm not a maintainer or anything..

[1] https://github.com/publicsuffix/list

There's the Public Suffix List https://publicsuffix.org/ but it's limited to domain names, so your github.com/rails example isn't covered. I'm pretty sure HN simply has a manually coded list of URL patterns for popular domains.

Browsers use the public suffix list to determine cookie scope. You can even get your own domains added to it.

https://publicsuffix.org/

Are you sure? Looking at their website[1] I see:

> Highlight the most important part of a domain name in the user interface

Which is my suggestion above.

> If you are using it for something else, you are encouraged to tell us, because it helps us to assess the potential impact of changes

Which sounds cautiously supportive of additional use cases.

[1] https://publicsuffix.org/

Sounds like Bluesky screwed up by not implementing the https://publicsuffix.org/ list

Furthermore, what constitutes a "Site" will also change henceforth. You can only add a primary domain (such as example.com) and the subdomains which are listed on the public suffix list (such as github.io, blogspot.com, etc.). Thus, your own subdomains (such as xyz.example.com or www.example.com) won't be allowed in Adsense.

> In fact I think Firefox would have to implement a similar approach if it were popular enough

They implement an omnibox that works well. Why would they need to do this if they were more popular? I suppose they use the domain suffix list for this. It's probably not bulletproof, but it works well enough and doesn't hammer the root DNS servers.

https://publicsuffix.org/

You can see how Mozilla tests the compliance of their built-in elements in the Gecko repository (the ok and is assertions are defined in their SimpleTest testing framework). And here's the Web Platform Tests' reflection harness, with data for each built-in element in sibling files, that almost every browser pass.

The source is mirrored on GitHub here: https://github.com/mozilla/gecko-dev

Code search is here: https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/

Yes. https://github.com/mozilla/gecko-dev/tree/32c74afbb24dce4b5d...

aWheelInput.mDeltaY looks like the increment setting used for this https://github.com/mozilla/gecko-dev/commit/9033e3e1200acfd4b8f8ae024c215b99d12b97bdTried "mousewheel.default.delta_multiplier_y" and "mousewheel.with_control.delta_multiplier_y" without much luck.It may have something to do with https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1138704 although this case is about pinch zoom emulation.

You could add the feature by writing code to support is - https://firefox-source-docs.mozilla.org/setup/index.html

I checked Firefox monorepo, it has over 4x more C++ than Rust.

Are you leaving steps out or is your OP exhaustive? If you just straight up cloned release and that's it, start all over and follow https://firefox-source-docs.mozilla.org/setup/index.html for your OS