lint-staged VS ava

We were already using lint-staged and have a pre-commit hook in place using Husky in our project for linter and prettier. So it made sense to add a check here.

Now you can config it in your package.json, here is the guide doc:

In the world of software development, maintaining consistent code quality and ensuring that the codebase adheres to predefined patterns and guidelines is crucial. However, manually enforcing these standards can be time-consuming and error-prone. This is where automation tools like Husky, Lint-Staged, Commitlint, and Commitizen come to the rescue. In this post, we will explore how these tools can be combined to streamline your development workflow.

This is wasted work that can and should be automated. Adding a linter and formatter on CI and a pre-commit hook such as lint-staged can do wonders.

lint-staged is a package that can be used to run formatting and linting commands on staged files in a Git repo.

To answer your next question: I lint and format on save, and I use Git hooks installed by Husky and executed through Lint-Staged (this tool helps ensure your Git hooks only run on modified files, etc) to ensure there are no lint or formatting errors whenever making a commit or pushing code. This is helpful for teams, as some developers tend to forget to run lint tasks, or don't have the Prettier extension installed in their IDE. If there are lint errors, the commit is rejected until fixed. YMMV - you'll need to fine-tune the strictness of this based on the team's needs.

Uses Husky Git hooks and Lint-staged pre-commit hooks.

Something else to consider is applying linting and formatting before every git commit. A package like Lint-staged only lints and formats on staged items, ensuring all pushed code follows the standards in the repo. This allows developers to have their own formatting preferences when developing, while the code homogenizes on push. Linting pre-commit also avoids strict rules like no-console or no-unused-vars restricting a developer when writing code, when it should only apply in production. Imagine not being able to console log anything during development!

Lint-Staged Docs

Additionally, there are pre-commit hooks which can be setup to seamlessly validate and modify the source code before every commit. I followed Prettier documentation to create one. I ran npx mrm@2 lint-staged which installed husky and lint-stagedand added a configuration to the project’s package.json. Then, I modified the commands a little and that's it.

We use Jest Framework for testing. Jest is not a dogma, and, of course, in its place can be any other test runner, such as Mocha or Ava. Let's focus on tests. I'll provide a short example because I don’t want to waste your time. You can find the full version here. It's crucial to read the comments in the code below. Let's go!

> In the popular jest test runner, each test file is executed in its own child process.

Is that confirmed?

I've been following this issue:

https://github.com/jestjs/jest/issues/6957

And what Jest actually does is still kind of muddy.

In contrast to that, other test runners like AVA have a clear description what happens when:

https://github.com/avajs/ava/blob/main/docs/01-writing-tests...

I've been looking at using japa or ava for web server testing but was curious what others were using and why.

Continued work on the test suite. Implementing AVA, with snapshotting. Making a lot of effort to have the snapshot directory structure match the test262 test directory structure by generating AVA test files.

You might want to give ava a spin:

https://github.com/avajs/ava/

It has a TAP reporter, but more importantly, as opposed to the more popular solutions, like Jest, the way it achieves parallelism is explained in the docs and won't change anytime soon, thus preventing wonky, hard to debug errors which occur when this part is abstracted away.

I switched to ava for that reason and have been very happy with it. But vitest looks nice, too. Thanks for the pointer.

Runs unit tests using AVA.

Last but not least important are ava, uvu and tape; they are a really light and fast test runners.

I've had some good experiences with Ava + Sinon. I've personally disliked Jest because it seemed to do some weird trickery in the background that prevented me from using ES modules.

Ava for a simpler environment than Jest, which I usually use. I need to check how to mock ESM with it, though.