legit VS git-branchless

Compare legit vs git-branchless and see what are their differences.

legit

Git for Humans, Inspired by GitHub for Mac™. (by frostming)

git-branchless

High-velocity, monorepo-scale workflow for Git (by arxanas)
Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
legit git-branchless
5 55
5,701 3,306
- -
0.0 9.4
7 months ago 5 days ago
Python Rust
BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License Apache License 2.0
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

legit

Posts with mentions or reviews of legit. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-11-02.

git-branchless

Posts with mentions or reviews of git-branchless. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-12-10.
  • Ask HN: Can we do better than Git for version control?
    17 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 10 Dec 2023
    Yes, but due to its simplicity + extensibility + widespread adoption, I wouldn’t be surprised if we’re still using Git 100+ years from now.

    The current trend (most popular and IMO likely to succeed) is to make tools (“layers”) which work on top of Git, like more intuitive UI/patterns (https://github.com/jesseduffield/lazygit, https://github.com/arxanas/git-branchless) and smart merge resolvers (https://github.com/Symbolk/IntelliMerge, https://docs.plasticscm.com/semanticmerge/how-to-configure/s...). Git it so flexible, even things that it handles terribly by default, it handles

  • Meta developer tools: Working at scale
    6 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 28 Jun 2023
  • Show HN: Gut – An easy-to-use CLI for Git
    19 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 30 Mar 2023
  • Branchless Workflow for Git
    1 project | /r/hypeurls | 8 Jan 2023
    4 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 8 Jan 2023
    > Is this for a case where a bunch of people branch from master@HEAD (lets call this A), then you need to modify A, so you then need to rebase each branch that branched from A individually?

    Mainly it's for when you branch from A multiple times, and then modify A. This can happen if you have some base work that you build multiple features on top of. I routinely do this as part of rapid prototyping, as described here: https://github.com/arxanas/git-branchless/wiki/Workflow:-div...

    `git undo` shows a list of operations it'll execute, which you have to confirm before accepting. Of course, it's ultimately a matter of trust in the tools you use.

  • Where are my Git UI features from the future?
    9 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 8 Jan 2023
  • git-branchless: High-velocity, monorepo-scale workflow for Git
    1 project | /r/CKsTechNews | 17 Nov 2022
  • git-branchless
    1 project | news.ycombinator.com | 17 Nov 2022
  • Show HN: Maiao, Stacked Diffs for GitHub
    4 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 8 Oct 2022
    What happens is you work somewhere that has stacked diffs and suddenly you learn how to shape your diffs to make them easy to review. Thinking of how folks will review your code in chunks while writing it makes it cleaner. Having small but easy to read diffs makes reviews faster and helps junior devs learn how to review.

    Sometimes this doesn’t happen in which case you end up need to split your commit at the end. This is where git utterly fails. You end up needing git split and git absorb to make this productive.

    Git split let’s you select which chunks in a commit should belong to it and then splits that into a commit and then you do it again and again until you have lots of commits. You’ll still need to probably test each one but the majority of the work is done

    Git absorb takes changes on the top of your stack and magically finds which commit in your stack the each chunk should belong to and amends it to the right commit

    You also need git branchless https://github.com/arxanas/git-branchless as it lets you move up and down the stack without needing to remember so much git arcana.

  • High velocity, monorepo-scale workflow for Git
    1 project | news.ycombinator.com | 19 Sep 2022

What are some alternatives?

When comparing legit and git-branchless you can also consider the following projects:

auto-cpufreq - Automatic CPU speed & power optimizer for Linux

graphite-cli - Graphite's CLI makes creating and submitting stacked changes easy.

sublime_merge - Issue tracker for Sublime Merge

jj - A Git-compatible VCS that is both simple and powerful

Git - Git Source Code Mirror - This is a publish-only repository but pull requests can be turned into patches to the mailing list via GitGitGadget (https://gitgitgadget.github.io/). Please follow Documentation/SubmittingPatches procedure for any of your improvements.

magit - It's Magit! A Git Porcelain inside Emacs.

topalias - Linux bash/zsh aliases generator

vimagit - Ease your git workflow within Vim

git-cli-tools - Collection of CLI tools for Git.

lazygit - simple terminal UI for git commands

vim-fugitive - fugitive.vim: A Git wrapper so awesome, it should be illegal

libgit2 - A cross-platform, linkable library implementation of Git that you can use in your application.