lauf VS Librum

I have a VM lying around: https://github.com/foonathan/lauf

Yeah, that's what I'm doing in lauf. When returning, the stack segments stay allocated and can be reused when it reaches the end again.

I'm working on lauf, which is a low-level bytecode Interpreter: https://github.com/foonathan/lauf

I've been working on a generic bytecode interpreter the last couple of months. It reached a point where I needed to test it in a real compiler, so I've started writing a C interpreter.

I'm currently writing a C interpreter using my lauf bytecode interpreter. It's developed live on Youtube where I'm streaming every Tuesday and Thursday at 17:00 CEST/CET: https://www.youtube.com/c/foonathan

>Why should they have to justify providing free software?

They don't, but they have to be honest about what they're presenting. There's this shitty motte-and-bailey situation in open source where their website ( https://librumreader.com/ ) looks like marketing for a serious application - but the moment you treat it like a serious application, people are like "it's free, why are you treating it like a serious application?".

Look:

>Simplicity

>Focus on what actually matters, using a simple and straight forward interface.

>Your time is too valuable to be wasted on complex applications.

What does the tone here convey? Is it "this is just a cool project I wrote"?

Thank you for reading, here are links to the project if you want to take a look: Our current website: https://librumreader.com The client application: https://github.com/Librum-Reader/Librum

Hey, I want to add CI to a project that depends on a big framework and some smaller linux libraries (https://github.com/Librum-Reader/Librum). I have a command that installs all dependencies on ubuntu, but it takes some minutes to install all of these libraries.

Thank you in advance for any advice on this topic (For some context, here is my project's github repository: (https://github.com/Librum-Reader/Librum)