stunner VS auto-animate

If you are interested in checking out the open-source project here you can find more: https://github.com/l7mp/stunner

Check out the demo here: https://github.com/l7mp/stunner/tree/main/docs/examples/mediasoup

Work has been done on this kind of issue, see e.g. https://github.com/l7mp/stunner

STUNner: A Kubernetes ingress gateway for WebRTC\ (9 comments)

https://auto-animate.formkit.com/ some basic inspiration - consider also that this is free and just takes donations.. That model brings people to you and then you can do bespoke projects and charge too

You can see here and here how all frameworks need to use specific wrappers while Svelte can use the core library

You could also have a look at https://auto-animate.formkit.com, it's perfect for what you want to do

You may also consider AutoAnimate and dndkit

📣 Howdy, I’m Justin Schroeder (author of FormKit and AutoAnimate) — I just released a new experimental JavaScript library for rendering interfaces declaratively. A few of the talking points:

Building any kind of Web app requires Animations to look good we can add Animation by either third-party Libs like Framer motion or plain old CSS but problem is all of these options needs us to write a ton of code and define all animation timing and stuff we are going to skip all of those today and use Autoanimate to do the animation for us.

I really don't understand the point of showing who have starred the project. When I open a link that ends with /stargazers, I immediately click the project name to navigate to the home page. But since I have seen too many of these, I want to ask why, maybe there's some considerations I don't know.

(Just met two "stargazer" links in the past 30 minutes: https://github.com/formkit/auto-animate/stargazers , https://github.com/payloadcms/payload/stargazers)

AutoAnimate – Add motion to web apps with a single line of code\ (31 comments)