kubespy VS sops

lang="en"> charset="utf-8"> Hello, world! Hello, world! 👋 Deployed with 💜 by new href="https://pulumi.com/">Pulumi.

Pulumi IaC will help us bring up our infrastructure on the AWS Cloud. Check out pulumi.com if you still need to become familiar with it. You can deploy this demo stack using the Pulumi button below.

There are other infrastructure as code tools that take secrets seriously. Pulumi encrypts all values in state and you can even bring your own key from your cloud provider

*Codifying the deployment of the OTel Collector *(to Nomad, Kubernetes, or a VM) using tools such as Terraform, Pulumi, or Ansible. The Collector funnels your OTel data to your Observability back-end. ✅

KubeSpy - to see what's going on a deployment real time. https://github.com/pulumi/kubespy

it takes too much time, terraform configs are not easy to use also. Pulumi is much better to maintenance. Cloudy is good enough for launching a production-ready cluster in 5-10 minutes. It could be an alternative to kops

Just wanted to mention a Terraform alternative I really like, especially cause it's infrastructure as code (IaC) http://pulumi.com/, though I'm not sure about their approach on multi cloud, haven't used it in quite a while

That is the entire point of Pulumi, you should give it a try

pulumi.com if you are interested in doing anything dynamic inside of your templates (i.e. conditions) take a look at pulumi

My script just sets up default .sops.yaml for https://github.com/getsops/sops

You can further edit .sops.yaml(eg have multiple of them) and decide how you split secrets in your directory tree to further customize who can decrypt the secrets.

It works pretty well for prod/dev splits, etc

Mozilla SOPS (Secrets OPerationS) is an open-source command-line tool for managing and storing secrets. It uses secure encryption methods to encrypt secrets at rest and decrypt them at runtime. SOPS supports a variety of key management systems, including AWS KMS, GCP KMS, Azure Key Vault, and PGP. It's particularly useful in a DevOps context where sensitive data like API keys, passwords, or certificates need to be securely managed and seamlessly integrated into application workflows.

Encrypted secrets thanks to SOPS and Age

We do the exact same thing to keep track of some credentials we use sops[1] and AWS KMS to separate credentials by sensitivity, then use the git differ to view the diffs between the encrypted secrets

Definitely not best practice security-wise, but it works well

[1] https://github.com/getsops/sops

For anyone new to SOPS like I was - https://github.com/getsops/sops

I've found this is largely solved by strictly separating plain config and secrets, and then having secrets pull from GCP secret manager / vault / whatever.

You can then commit all the config (including the secret identifiers) and it all just works so long as you're authenticated with your secret storage system.

We do this for the live configuration as well in line with Gitops and find it to work well.

If you don't want to use a cloud secret manager you can also use something like https://github.com/getsops/sops to commit the encrypted secrets safely

Basically, the simpler the better --just encrypt your secrets and check them in to version control.

We use SOPS[0] for this, and have found it to be pretty nice.

[0]: https://github.com/getsops/sops

The answer is that secrets shouldn't be stored in the git repo at all, but somewhere safe like a password manager or Mozilla's SOPS which people seem to love.

Unfortunately, the SOPS project is in some sort of a limbo state and there has been quite a long period with limited maintenance and unclear position from Mozilla. Despite the project being accepted into the CNCF, it's still unclear what will happen with it going forward.