kubernetes-ingress VS Nginx

Everything in the YAML snippets below — except for ingress configuration — relates to configuring the NGINX ingress controller. This includes customizing the default configuration.

In these examples, I assume that users have deployed an nginx-ingress-controller to their cluster through the eks layer. This controller is responsible for creating an nlb and exposing Elasticsearch and Kibana to the internet through their ingresses.

Now, you need to install the Nginx Ingress Controller so that it can redirect incoming requests to your payment app to use HTTPS. Since you've exposed the app using nodePort, you need to install the Ingress using a custom value file that specifies the service type to NodePort.

Kubernetes We have a kubernetes cluster which has a dropwizard based web application running as a service. This application has a rest uri to upload files. It cannot upload files larger than 1MB. I get the following error: ERROR [2017-07-27 13:32:47,629] io.dropwizard.jersey.errors.LoggingExceptionMapper: Error handling a request: ea812501b414f0d9! com.fasterxml.jackson.core.JsonParseException: Unexpected character ('<' (code 60)): expected a valid value (number, String, array, object, 'true', 'false' or 'null')! at [Source: ! 413 Request Entity Too Large! ! 413 Request Entity Too Large! nginx/1.11.3! ! Hide resultsI have tried the suggestions given in https://github.com/nginxinc/kubernetes-ingress/issues/21. I have edited the Ingress to set the proxy-body-size annotation. Also, I have tried using the configMap without any success. we are using kubernetes version 1.5. Please let me know if you need additional information. Answer link : https://codehunter.cc/a/kubernetes/kubernetes-cannot-upload-files-larger-than-1mb

The example below shows how to configure a canary deployment using Nginx Ingress. The custom annotations used here are specific to Nginx:

This: https://kubernetes.github.io/ingress-nginx/ Not this: https://docs.nginx.com/nginx-ingress-controller/

So far, i've been following the example here to set up an nginx Ingress Controller and some test services behind it. However, I am unable to follow Step 6 which displays the external IP for the node that the load balancer is running on as my node does not have an ExternalIP in the addresses section, only a LegacyHostIP and InternalIP.

Also, of personal note, I highly recommend you use the "ingress-nginx" controller which has a huge community and is of much higher quality and flexibility than the "nginx-ingress controller by nginx inc". I've had a lot of success with dozens of clients with this controller. It rocks!

For example, the ingress project from NGINX has its own CRDs that give better control over service versions and blue/green and canary cutovers https://github.com/nginxinc/kubernetes-ingress/tree/v3.0.0/examples/custom-resources/traffic-splitting

Yeah, unless I'm looking at it wrong, there doesn't seem to be any meaningful difference between 1.25.5 and 1.26.0:

https://github.com/nginx/nginx/compare/release-1.25.5...rele...

However, it's very unlikely that .NET developers will directly expose their Kestrel-based web apps to the internet. Typically, we use other popular web servers like Nginx, Traefik, and Caddy to act as a reverse-proxy in front of Kestrel for various reasons:

> I actually don't understand why I am seeing arguments like this all the time.

Have a look at:

https://github.com/nginx/nginx/blob/master/src/http/modules/...

It's got the whole checklist: nginx idiosyncratic module system, inline parsing, custom utf conversion, buffer preallocation and adjustments, linked lists, comments about side effects of custom allocator, and probably other things.

It's not easy to deal with source like that and any serious improvement to that area would effectively be a rewrite anyway.

Since anything doing work in nginx is a module anyway, it wouldn't even have to be a full rewrite in one go.

According to this article, nGinx is being used to serve 34% of all websites in the world. I checked out who's contributing to nGinx, and just like I thought, the project has 8,208 commits, and 5,366 of those commits was made by 2 software developers; igorsoev and mdounin.

Nginx + Roadrunner (fcgi mode)

Apache’s mod_fastcgi’s last commit was 2 weeks ago:

https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/

It’s a fork of what you linked (and was more popular afaik back when fastcgi was state of the art, and apache was the undisputed champion of web servers).

These days, nginx has more market share than apache, and its fastcgi module is one of the more recently updated ones in its source tree (5 months vs multiple years):

https://github.com/nginx/nginx/tree/master/src/http/modules

If I was going to build an embedded web server, I’d start with nostd rust, probably with though axum + tokio, since thats already memory safe-ish.

If I needed fastcgi for some reason (dynamically loadable endpoints, or os-level isolation), there are at least four implementations of fastcgi for it. No idea if any are decent though.

APISIX is an API Gateway. It builds upon OpenResty, a Lua layer built on top of the famous nginx reverse-proxy. APISIX adds abstractions to the mix, e.g., Route, Service, Upstream, and offers a plugin-based architecture.