kubernetes-ingress VS mkcert

Everything in the YAML snippets below — except for ingress configuration — relates to configuring the NGINX ingress controller. This includes customizing the default configuration.

In these examples, I assume that users have deployed an nginx-ingress-controller to their cluster through the eks layer. This controller is responsible for creating an nlb and exposing Elasticsearch and Kibana to the internet through their ingresses.

Now, you need to install the Nginx Ingress Controller so that it can redirect incoming requests to your payment app to use HTTPS. Since you've exposed the app using nodePort, you need to install the Ingress using a custom value file that specifies the service type to NodePort.

Kubernetes We have a kubernetes cluster which has a dropwizard based web application running as a service. This application has a rest uri to upload files. It cannot upload files larger than 1MB. I get the following error: ERROR [2017-07-27 13:32:47,629] io.dropwizard.jersey.errors.LoggingExceptionMapper: Error handling a request: ea812501b414f0d9! com.fasterxml.jackson.core.JsonParseException: Unexpected character ('<' (code 60)): expected a valid value (number, String, array, object, 'true', 'false' or 'null')! at [Source: ! 413 Request Entity Too Large! ! 413 Request Entity Too Large! nginx/1.11.3! ! Hide resultsI have tried the suggestions given in https://github.com/nginxinc/kubernetes-ingress/issues/21. I have edited the Ingress to set the proxy-body-size annotation. Also, I have tried using the configMap without any success. we are using kubernetes version 1.5. Please let me know if you need additional information. Answer link : https://codehunter.cc/a/kubernetes/kubernetes-cannot-upload-files-larger-than-1mb

The example below shows how to configure a canary deployment using Nginx Ingress. The custom annotations used here are specific to Nginx:

This: https://kubernetes.github.io/ingress-nginx/ Not this: https://docs.nginx.com/nginx-ingress-controller/

So far, i've been following the example here to set up an nginx Ingress Controller and some test services behind it. However, I am unable to follow Step 6 which displays the external IP for the node that the load balancer is running on as my node does not have an ExternalIP in the addresses section, only a LegacyHostIP and InternalIP.

Also, of personal note, I highly recommend you use the "ingress-nginx" controller which has a huge community and is of much higher quality and flexibility than the "nginx-ingress controller by nginx inc". I've had a lot of success with dozens of clients with this controller. It rocks!

For example, the ingress project from NGINX has its own CRDs that give better control over service versions and blue/green and canary cutovers https://github.com/nginxinc/kubernetes-ingress/tree/v3.0.0/examples/custom-resources/traffic-splitting

The experimental HTTPS flag relies on mkcert, designed for a single development system. If you run a Docker container, the flag won’t configure your local browser to trust its certificate.

The author mentions difficulties with HTTPS and trying stuff locally.

I've had some success with mkcert [1] to easily create certificates trusted by browsers, I can suggest to look into this. You are your own root CA, I think it can work without an internet connection.

[1] https://github.com/FiloSottile/mkcert/

Solution: mkcert – Your Zero-Configuration HTTPS Enabler Meet mkcert, a user-friendly, zero-configuration tool designed for creating locally-trusted development certificates. Find it on its GitHub page and follow the instructions tailored for your operating system. For Mac users employing Homebrew, simply execute the following commands in your terminal:

Well, Certifi does not ship with your company's certificates! So requesting internal services may come with additional painful extra steps! Also for a local development environment that uses mkcert for example!

My project, getlocalcert.net[1] may be the one you're thinking of.

Since I'm also building in this space, I'll give my perspective. Local certificate generation is complicated. If you spend the time, you can figure it out, but it's begging for a simpler solution. You can use tools like mkcert[2] for anything that's local to your machine. However, if you're already using ACME in production, maybe you'd prefer to use ACME locally? I think that's what Anchor offers, a unified approach.

There's a couple references in the Anchor blog about solving the distribution problem by building better tooling[3]. I'm eager to learn more, that's a tough nut to crack. My theory for getlocalcert is that the distribution problem is too difficult (for me) to solve, so I layer the tool on top of Let's Encrypt certificates instead. The end result for both tools is a trusted TLS certificate issued via ACME automation.

1. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36674224

2. https://github.com/FiloSottile/mkcert

3. https://blog.anchor.dev/the-acme-gap-introducing-anchor-part...

Looks like step-ca/step-cli [1] and mkcert [2] have been mentioned. Another related tool is XCA [3] - a gui tool to manage CAs and server/client TLS certificates. It takes off some of the tedium in using openssl cli directly. It also stores the certs and keys in an encrypted database. It doesn't solve the problem of getting the root CA certificate into the system store or of hosting the revocation list. I use XCA to create and store the root CA. Intermediate CAs signed with it are passed to other issuers like vault and step-issuer.

[1] https://smallstep.com/docs/step-ca/

[2] https://github.com/FiloSottile/mkcert

[3] https://hohnstaedt.de/xca/

We use mkcert for this, it works wonderfully.

https://github.com/FiloSottile/mkcert