python VS bython

One option is to use list_namespace(), as described in https://github.com/kubernetes-client/python/blob/master/kubernetes/docs/CoreV1Api.md

I have checked the python version == 2.7 and pip freeze - ipaddress==1.0.22, urllib3==1.24.1 and websocket-client==0.54.0 are the versions which satisfy the requirement - as mentioned here: https://github.com/kubernetes-client/python/blob/master/README.md#hostname-doesnt-matchfollowed the issue on this thread - https://github.com/kubernetes-client/python/issues/36 - not much help.

kubectl apply -f class.yamlkubectl apply -f rbac.yamlkubectl apply -f deployment-arm.yaml I want to use the kubernetes-client written in python to replace it. My current code, loads the there yaml files (using pyyaml), edits them a bit, inserts into a file and use the command line kubectl to execute those three commands. Some of the code:

In the Kubernetes Python client code it's called "klass":

https://github.com/kubernetes-client/python/blob/1a0cb469528e6b2bdeb3eb2c06945f1c22303dfd/kubernetes/client/api_client.py#L266

and in Apache ecosystem it's called clazz:

https://github.com/search?q=org%3Aapache+clazz&type=code

Just thought it was amusing and wanted to share

One way is to use configmap lock https://github.com/kubernetes-client/python/tree/master/kubernetes/base/leaderelection

I'm having trouble connecting to the kubernetes python client even though I'm following the examples here in the api.

As you can imagine, that's a lot of functions to choose from, luckily all of them are listed in docs and you can click on any one of them to get an example of its usage.

before judging too hard, this might be a project from a 15yo forking another project that replaces indentation with brackets in python code (https://github.com/mathialo/bython).

bro actually made a meme into reality.

What should we do with Python? There are no curly braces here, and if you suggest to your colleagues that team should start writing in Bython, they might call 911.

Because bython is basically a glorified regular expression search and replace: https://github.com/mathialo/bython/blob/master/bython/parser...

Rather than a real parser. A real parser knows about the context it is in, and as long as the grammar is unambiguous about some character, it can be reused in as many distinct parser constructions as you like. A pure regex-based approach to a first approximation can not.

Whether or not it absolutely can or can't, without "approximation" and with regard to the exact re library in Python, would be something you'd have to work out through tedious effort. Regexes with backtracking can do a lot more than mathematical regexes, as well as all the other elaborations you could use. But even if Python's re can do it, you will be better off with a real parser.

The "correct" solution, since by design Python and Bython share the same AST, is to take some existing code that can parse and re-emit Python code without changing it, tweak the incoming grammar to use braces instead, then emit the AST back out as Python. Then you wouldn't have this problem, or the problem with comments referenced in the source code (line 109 of the file I linked, just up a bit), or any of the probably other many little issues that would arise on real code if you tried to put this in real use.

use bython.

For those who missing braces: https://github.com/mathialo/bython ;-)

You can try using bpython, but I would recommend just getting used to it.

It exists

And then of course there's this insanity.