kube-fledged VS kubefwd

Exactly. Part of the appeal to consolidate all of our container images to use Debian-slim is the ability to optimise the caching of layers, both in our container registry but also on our kubernetes cluster’s nodes (which can be done in a consistent manner with kube-fledged[1]).

[1] https://github.com/senthilrch/kube-fledged

If you're pulling big images you could try kube-fledged (it's the simplest option, a CRD that works like a pre-puller for your images), or if you have a big cluster you can try a p2p distributor, like kraken or dragonfly2.

Also there's that project called Nydus that allows starting up big containers way faster. IIRC, starts the container before pulling the whole image, and begins to pull data as needed from the registry.

https://github.com/senthilrch/kube-fledged

https://github.com/dragonflyoss/Dragonfly2

https://github.com/uber/kraken

https://nydus.dev/

kube fledged - pre pull containes in nodes: https://github.com/senthilrch/kube-fledged

kube-fledged is a kubernetes add-on or operator for creating and managing a cache of container images directly on the worker nodes of a kubernetes cluster. It allows a user to define a list of images and onto which worker nodes those images should be cached (i.e. pulled). As a result, application pods start almost instantly, since the images need not be pulled from the registry. kube-fledged provides CRUD APIs to manage the lifecycle of the image cache, and supports several configurable parameters in order to customize the functioning as per one’s needs. (URL: https://github.com/senthilrch/kube-fledged)

I found recently this tool kube-fledged that should do what you want..

I recommend you also look at kube-fledged this is more appealing IMHO.

kubefwd bulk port forward: https://github.com/txn2/kubefwd

Not sure if it covers what you need, but I was using kubefwd to do my port forwarding for services and I was super happy

kubefwd (Kube Forward)

Kubefwd works similar to Telepresence by making your local environment think it is inside the cluster. The networking tunnel is one direction only. Telepresence is much smarter as it also makes the other cluster applications think that your local app is inside the same cluster. So with Kubefwd you only get 50% of what basic Telepresence offers. Telepresence also has volume mounting support for more advanced scenarios.

For anyone that doesn't want to open youtube for the link to github: https://github.com/txn2/kubefwd