kotlin-flow-extensions
swift-evolution
| kotlin-flow-extensions | swift-evolution | |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 124 | |
| 504 | 15,030 | |
| - | 0.5% | |
| 6.4 | 9.7 | |
| about 2 months ago | 3 days ago | |
| Kotlin | Markdown | |
| Apache License 2.0 | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
kotlin-flow-extensions
-
Are there any good tutorials showing the use of Reactor streams using Kotlin?
I don't know, why I'm downvoted here, but it is very relevant if the library provide the operators you need or if you have to implement them yourself. If Kotlin Flow is enough, then use it. From experience you don't have to go to far to miss operators from Reactor or RxJava. Maybe some day additional libraries like https://github.com/akarnokd/kotlin-flow-extensions will fill the gap, but for the time being Reactor or RxJava offer a lot more for (not trivial) real world use cases.
-
Kotlin Team AMA #3: Ask Us Anything
Why do you want to keep Flow such a small library? It could be an attractive alternative to RxJava or Reactor, but it misses many useful operators today. On the other hand it brings a lot more operatores than would be required as a foundation for other frameworks (likeKotlin Flow Extensions). From my point of view Flow stays in the middleground with no good reason.
swift-evolution
-
Byte-Sized Swift: Building Tiny Games for the Playdate
[A Vision for Embedded Swift](https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/main/visions/e...) has the details on this new build mode and is quite interesting.
> Effectively, there will be two bottom layers of Swift, and the lower one, “non-allocating” Embedded Swift, will necessarily be a more restricted compilation mode (e.g. classes will be disallowed as they fundamentally require heap allocations) and likely to be used only in very specialized use cases. “Allocating” Embedded Swift should allow classes and other language facilities that rely on the heap (e.g. indirect enums).
Also, this seems to maybe hint at the Swift runtime eventually being reimplemented in non-allocating Embedded Swift rather than the C++ (?) that it uses now:
> The Swift runtime APIs will be provided as an implementation that’s optimized for small codesize and will be available as a static library in the toolchain for common CPU architectures. Interestingly, it’s possible to write that implementation in “non-allocating” Baremetal Swift.
-
Borrow Checking Without Lifetimes
I may be out of my depth here as I've only casually used Rust, but this seems similar to Swift's proposed lifetime dependencies[1]. They're not in the type system formally so maybe they're closer to poloneius work
[1]: https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/3055becc53a3c3...
-
Functional Ownership Through Fractional Uniqueness
Swift recently adopted a region-based approach for safe concurrency that builds on Milano et al’s ideas: https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/main/proposals...
- Swift-evolution/proposals/0373-vars-without-limits-in-result-builders.md
- The Swift proposal that removed the ++ and –- operators (2017)
-
Crafting Self-Evident Code with D
No, it's not. Refcounting CAN be a garbage collection algorithm, but in Swift it's deterministic and done at compile time. Not to mention recently added support for non-copyable types that enforces unique ownership: https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/main/proposals...
- Statically link Swift runtime libraries by default on supported platforms
- (5.9) What is the point of a SerialExecutor that can silently re-order jobs?
-
Mac shipments grow 10%, as all major PC brands see downturns.
You can stackallocate buffers with unsafe Swift but it's not exactly fun to use. https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/main/proposals/0322-temporary-buffers.md
-
Can someone explain how Task really works in terms of threads (I couldnt ask all the questions with the swift team today)?
If the docs do not suffice, read the concurrency proposals of Swift Evolution. The authors describe the semantics in a very detailed way there.
What are some alternatives?
kotlinx-datetime - KotlinX multiplatform date/time library
compose-multiplatform - Compose Multiplatform, a modern UI framework for Kotlin that makes building performant and beautiful user interfaces easy and enjoyable.
Reactive Streams - Reactive Streams Specification for the JVM
foundationdb - FoundationDB - the open source, distributed, transactional key-value store
htmx - </> htmx - high power tools for HTML
multik - Multidimensional array library for Kotlin
okio - A modern I/O library for Android, Java, and Kotlin Multiplatform.
kotlin-wrappers - Kotlin wrappers for popular JavaScript libraries
PeopleInSpace - Kotlin Multiplatform project with SwiftUI, Jetpack Compose, Compose for Wear, Compose for Desktop, Compose for Web and Kotlin/JS + React clients along with Ktor backend.
rsocket - RSocket Protocol Definition
swift-algorithms - Commonly used sequence and collection algorithms for Swift