koda-validate
django-pgtransaction
Our great sponsors
| koda-validate | django-pgtransaction | |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | 2 | |
| 108 | 48 | |
| - | - | |
| 5.2 | 5.3 | |
| 21 days ago | 7 days ago | |
| Python | Python | |
| MIT License | BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
koda-validate
-
Pydantic V2 leverages Rust's Superpowers [video]
As someone who built a pure python validation library[0] that's much faster than pydantic (~1.5x - 12x depending on the benchmark), I have to say that this whole focus on Rust seems premature. There's clearly a lot of room for pydantic to optimize its Python implementation.
Beyond that, rust seems like a great fit for tooling (i.e. ruff), but as a library used at runtime, it seems a little odd to make a validation library (which can expect to receive any kind of data valid python data) to also be constrained by a separate set of data types which are valid in rust.
[0]: https://github.com/keithasaurus/koda-validate
-
beartype: It has documentation now. It only took two years, my last hair follicle, precious sanity points (SPs), and working with Sphinx. Don't be like @leycec. Go hard on documentation early.
For the sake of comparison I built a validate_signature function as part of koda-validate, which has a lot of overlap with beartype. I haven't really compared it to beartype, so I'd be interested to see people's thoughts on how the two approaches compare.
-
Pydantic vs Protobuf vs Namedtuples vs Dataclasses
FYI I wrote koda-validate, which is significantly faster than pydantic, has a similar API, and is pure python.
- Koda Validate: Alternative to Pydantic that is faster, more flexible, and async-compatible.
- I built a composable validation library. It plays nice with type hints and asyncio. Would love some feedback!
- Koda Validate: Flexible, Explicit, Async-compatible Validation in Python
- Show HN: Koda Validate 2.0 – Async Validation in Python
-
This Week In Python
koda-validate – Typesafe Validation
- Show HN: Koda Validate – Typesafe, combinable validation for Python
django-pgtransaction
-
This Week In Python
django-pgtransaction – A context manager/decorator which extends Django's atomic function with the ability to set isolation level and retries for a given transaction
-
django-pgtransaction: A drop-in replacement for the default django.db.transaction module with enhanced Postgres functionality
Opus10 focusses on improving the Django ecosystem by building open source tools which promote and enhance the integration of Django with PostgreSQL. To that end, we have just released django-pgtransaction.
What are some alternatives?
pydantic-core - Core validation logic for pydantic written in rust
katara - Synthesize CRDTs from classic data types with verified lifting!
Twitter_Banner_Autoupdater - Twitter banner autoupdater using Tweepy Python module and the Twitter API
flake8-comments - Report redundant comments in python code
puff - ☁ Puff ☁ - The deep stack framework.
serialite - Serialization and deserialization library for Python
typedload - Python library to load dynamically typed data into statically typed data structures
msgspec - A fast serialization and validation library, with builtin support for JSON, MessagePack, YAML, and TOML
cinder - Cinder is Meta's internal performance-oriented production version of CPython.