klpt VS pygod

I did try it. And it's very good except for the part that I have a Hunspell dictionary with some custom logic (similar to snowball stemmers). Unfortunately I don't have a snowball stemmer so postgres simply ignores words that are not in the hunspell dictionary. So I want to use this library to do the stemming: https://github.com/sinaahmadi/klpt as it has custom rules implemented in python instead of relying on postgres

Ok, using ChatGPT and Bard (the irony lol) I learned a bit more about GNNs:

GNNs are probabilistic and can be trained to learn representations in graph-structured data and handling complex relationships, while classical graph algorithms are specialized for specific graph analysis tasks and operate based on predefined rules/steps.

* Why is PyG it called "Geometric" and not "Topologic" ?

Properties like connectivity, neighborhoods, and even geodesic distances can all be considered topological features of a graph. These features remain unchanged under continuous deformations like stretching or bending, which is the defining characteristic of topological equivalence. In this sense, "PyTorch Topologic" might be a more accurate reflection of the library's focus on analyzing the intrinsic structure and connections within graphs.

However, the term "geometric" still has some merit in the context of PyG. While most GNN operations rely on topological principles, some do incorporate notions of Euclidean geometry, such as:

- Node embeddings: Many GNNs learn low-dimensional vectors for each node, which can be interpreted as points in a vector space, allowing geometric operations like distances and angles to be applied.

- Spectral GNNs: These models leverage the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the graph Laplacian, which encodes information about the geometric structure and distances between nodes.

- Manifold learning: Certain types of graphs can be seen as low-dimensional representations of high-dimensional manifolds. Applying GNNs in this context involves learning geometric properties on the manifold itself.

Therefore, although topology plays a primary role in understanding and analyzing graphs, geometry can still be relevant in certain contexts and GNN operations.

* Real world applications:

- HuggingFace has a few models [0] around things like computational chemistry [1] or weather forecasting.

- PyGod [2] can be used for Outlier Detection (Anomaly Detection).

- Apparently ULTRA [3] can "infer" (in the knowledge graph sense), that Michael Jackson released some disco music :-p (see the paper).

- RGCN [4] can be used for knowledge graph link prediction (recovery of missing facts, i.e. subject-predicate-object triples) and entity classification (recovery of missing entity attributes).

- GreatX [5] tackles removing inherent noise, "Distribution Shift" and "Adversarial Attacks" (ex: noise purposely introduced to hide a node presence) from networks. Apparently this is a thing and the field is called "Graph Reliability" or "Reliable Deep Graph Learning". The author even has a bunch of "awesome" style lists of links! [6]

- Finally this repo has a nice explanation of how/why to run machine learning algorithms "outside of the DB":

"Pytorch Geometric (PyG) has a whole arsenal of neural network layers and techniques to approach machine learning on graphs (aka graph representation learning, graph machine learning, deep graph learning) and has been used in this repo [7] to learn link patterns, also known as link or edge predictions."

--

0: https://huggingface.co/models?pipeline_tag=graph-ml&sort=tre...

1: https://github.com/Microsoft/Graphormer

2: https://github.com/pygod-team/pygod

3: https://github.com/DeepGraphLearning/ULTRA

4: https://huggingface.co/riship-nv/RGCN

5: https://github.com/EdisonLeeeee/GreatX

6: https://edisonleeeee.github.io/projects.html

7: https://github.com/Orbifold/pyg-link-prediction