kharma VS PyLFG

Compare kharma vs PyLFG and see what are their differences.

kharma

Grammar-based fuzzing corpus generator (by Rog3rSm1th)
Fuzzing Fuzzer Grammar Python Security
Source Code
Suggest alternative
Edit details

PyLFG

PyLFG is a Python library for working within the Lexical Functional Grammar (LFG) formalism. It provides a set of classes and methods for representing and manipulating LFG structures, including f-structures and c-structures. (by Ars-Linguistica)
Grammar grammar-parser lexical-functional-grammar syntax-analysis Python
Source Code
Suggest alternative
Edit details
InfluxDB
Our great sponsors
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
Our great sponsors
kharma PyLFG
3 1
38 4
- -
0.8 10.0
about 1 year ago about 1 year ago
Python Python
MIT License MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

kharma

Posts with mentions or reviews of kharma. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

PyLFG

Posts with mentions or reviews of PyLFG. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.
  • Debugging my conlang's grammar with LFG?
    1 project | /r/conlangs | 20 Jul 2023
    I've been looking into various LFG parsers such as XLE-Web, XLFG, and PyLFG. I have a sort of crazy monster syntax inspired by my unquenchable thirst for syntactic exploration, but I'd like to tame and codify it into a list of rules and parameters, seeing what sentences end up being good or malformed given the constraints. Has anyone here tried analyzing their conlangs using LFG in particular?

What are some alternatives?

When comparing kharma and PyLFG you can also consider the following projects:

FormatFuzzer - FormatFuzzer is a framework for high-efficiency, high-quality generation and parsing of binary inputs.

Gramformer - A framework for detecting, highlighting and correcting grammatical errors on natural language text. Created by Prithiviraj Damodaran. Open to pull requests and other forms of collaboration.

boofuzz - A fork and successor of the Sulley Fuzzing Framework

language_tool_python - a free python grammar checker 📝✅

frelatage - Coverage-based fuzzer for python applications

kefir - 🥛turkic morphology project

Reconator - Automated Recon for Pentesting & Bug Bounty

Lark - Lark is a parsing toolkit for Python, built with a focus on ergonomics, performance and modularity.

grammarinator - ANTLR v4 grammar-based test generator

TatSu - 竜 TatSu generates Python parsers from grammars in a variation of EBNF

dirsearch - Web path scanner

plotnine - A Grammar of Graphics for Python

kharma vs FormatFuzzer PyLFG vs Gramformer kharma vs boofuzz PyLFG vs language_tool_python kharma vs frelatage PyLFG vs kefir kharma vs Reconator PyLFG vs Lark kharma vs grammarinator PyLFG vs TatSu kharma vs dirsearch PyLFG vs plotnine