keploy VS Next.js

October is the month of Open Source and Keploy is taking part in this celebration. You can contribute to several Keploy projects by participating in this year’s Hacktoberfest. You can both contribute to the code part and the no-code part as well. Here are some contributions that you can make!

curl --silent --location "https://github.com/keploy/keploy/releases/latest/download/keploy_linux_amd64.tar.gz" | tar xz -C /tmp sudo mkdir -p /usr/local/bin && sudo mv /tmp/keploy /usr/local/bin && keploy

Keploy is an open-source, end-to-end (E2E) testing toolkit for developers. It creates test cases and data mocks/stubs by recording API calls, database queries, etc., making releases faster and more reliable. Keploy works by being added as a middleware to your application. It captures and replays all network interaction served to the application from any source. This allows Keploy to generate test cases for all of your API endpoints, including those that are not explicitly tested by your unit tests. This can help you to identify and fix bugs that would otherwise go undetected. Keploy can create data mocks/stubs for your APIs, which can help you to isolate your tests and make them more reliable. It can automatically compare test cases generated from previously collected traffic against updated behaviour of your application, and bring any differences to your attention. This can help you to identify regressions in your production code early on.

I'm new to SEO, I run an OSS project and Semrush shows my project's main repo link as TOXIC backlink!! I'm not sure if I should add this to the whitelist of my domain.

I have once contributed to one similar project https://github.com/keploy/keploy , This can help you generate e2e tests and mocks as well , with real api and infra calls .

Please feel free to checkout keploy too - https://github.com/keploy/keploy

This looks very similar to keploy but specific to node apps. Keploy is designed to be multi language.

I recently discovered Keploy (https://github.com/keploy/keploy) and was really impressed by its promise that it can generate API tests with code coverage by itself just by recording API calls and mocking everything that goes outside of the application - including calls to external API endpoints and the database. It seems like a super useful tool and potentially a game changer, especially now that GPT is starting another wave of automation.

Next.js is a powerful React framework that enables developers to build server-rendered applications, static websites, and more. It's designed for production and provides features like automatic code splitting and optimized prefetching.

// source: https://github.com/vercel/next.js/blob/canary/packages/next/src/lib/worker.ts#L121C15-L129C16 for (;;) { onActivity() const result = await Promise.race(\[ (this.\_worker as any)\[method\](...args), restartPromise, \]) if (result !== RESTARTED) return result if (onRestart) onRestart(method, args, ++attempts) }

https://github.com/vercel/next.js/discussions/27666 One of them said 'renaming folder to uppercase' might cause trouble. git might not recognize case-sensetive changes by default.

Next.js has long cemented itself as one of the front runners in the web framework world for JavaScript/TypeScript projects so we’re going to be using that. More specifically we’re going to be using V14 of Next.js which allows us to use some exciting new features like Server Actions and the App Router.

Web frameworks like Next.js will usually include this feature, but do check that they set the caching headers correctly!

Vite and Next.js are both top 5 modern development framework right now. They are both great depending on your use case so we’ll discuss 4 areas: Architecture, main features, developer experience and production readiness. After learning about these we’ll have a better idea of which one is best for your project.

> It’s important to be aware of what you are getting if you go with React, and what you are getting is a far cry from what a framework would offer, with all the corresponding pros and cons.

Would you like to elaborate on that?

In my experience, with something as great, size/ecosystem-wise as React, there will almost always be at least one "mainstream" package for whatever you might want to do with it, that integrates pretty well. Where a lot of things might come out of the box with a framework, with a library I often find myself just needing to install the "right" package, and from there it's pretty much the same.

For example, using https://angular.io/guide/i18n-overview or installing and using https://react.i18next.com/

Or something like https://angular.io/guide/form-validation out of the box, vs installing and using https://formik.org/

Or perhaps https://angular.io/guide/router vs https://reactrouter.com/en/main

Even adding something that's not there out of the box is pretty much the same, like https://primeng.org/ or https://primereact.org/

React will typically have more fragmentation and therefore also choice, but I don't see those two experiences as that different. Updates and version management/supply chain will inevitably be more of a mess with the library, admittedly.

Now, projects like Next https://nextjs.org/ exist and add what some might regard as the missing pieces and work well if you want something opinionated and with lots of features out of the box, but a lot of those features (like SSR) are actually pretty advanced and not always even necessary.

Next.js: For the website and the admin dashboard

Until the time of writing, there is no official example of how to enable runtime environmental variables in a Dockerized Next.js app, as utilizing unstable_noStore would only dynamically evaluate variables on the server (node.js runtime). There is also an interesting discussion regarding this topic on GitHub.

next.js is a very popular React framework. remix-adonisjs includes more functionality through the AdonisJS backend ecosystem, and should be easier to self-host and self-manage.