kbio
io_uring-echo-server
| kbio | io_uring-echo-server | |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 1 | |
| 60 | 358 | |
| - | - | |
| 0.0 | 3.6 | |
| almost 2 years ago | 3 months ago | |
| Rust | C | |
| MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
kbio
-
kbio - Another Async IO Framework based on io_uring
Here we simply use the nopbench and rio-nopbench tests under example to compare the performance of kbio and Rio
io_uring-echo-server
-
Put an io_uring on it: Exploiting the Linux Kernel
> Network IO discussion: https://github.com/axboe/liburing/issues/536
I see an issue with a narrative but zero discussion at that link.
Furthermore, your io_uring benchmark being utilized in that issue isn't even batching CQE consumption. I've submitted a quick and dirty untested PR adding rudimentary batching at [0]. Frankly, what seems to be a constant din of poorly-written benchmarks portraying io_uring in a negative light vs. epoll is getting rather old.
[0] https://github.com/frevib/io_uring-echo-server/pull/16
What are some alternatives?
mobc - A generic connection pool for Rust with async/await support
rio - pure rust io_uring library, built on libc, thread & async friendly, misuse resistant
KuiBaDB - Another OLAP database
liburing
genawaiter - Stackless generators on stable Rust.
python-c-io_uring-example - Using io_uring Linux Kernel interface from Python by JITing C code with MetaCall.
io-uring - The `io_uring` library for Rust
rustyline-async - Rustyline, but with async support
async_io_uring - An event loop in Zig using io_uring and coroutines
Polyphony - Fine-grained concurrency for Ruby