kamal VS OpenVoice

Guessing you're talking about https://kamal-deploy.org/ which looks interesting, though I tend to like reconciliation logic based systems ... but often only fired off imperatively with a plan/apply separation. So I shall be having a poke around anyway :)

Navigating the deployment landscape can be a daunting task for any developer, particularly those going it alone. PopaDex uses Kamal as its deployment solution, due to its straightforward and efficient nature. This tool is designed to facilitate the quick deployment of Rails applications across diverse environments, streamlining what can often be a complicated process. Kamal's appeal lies in its ability to demystify deployment, removing the hurdles commonly associated with Docker and app deployment in general. A couple of the main benefits of Kamal:

Or you can use [https://kamal-deploy.org/] and GitHub actions for automating at least deploys, but there are still will be issues that you will need to solve.

For homelab, Docker compose should be enough

For something more production oriented https://github.com/basecamp/kamal

Kamal is a wonderfully simple way to deploy your applications anywhere. It will also be included by default in Rails 8. Kamal is trivial, but I don’t recommend using it on your development machine.

Given the inevitability of easy voice cloning[1], it seems irresponsible to be using voice as a positive authentication signal.

Unfortunately, major US financial institutions seem to be ramping up adoption of this technology[2].

Am I missing something?

[1] https://github.com/myshell-ai/OpenVoice

They might have been forced to give a signal after this rose on HN today:

https://research.myshell.ai/open-voice

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39861578