jscriptparse VS mgmt

Looks great, congrats!

I made a small interpreted language on top of nodejs, for the same customers. https://github.com/MoserMichael/jscriptparse

However it turns out that you can't draw too much with node, so I didn't manage to add turtle graphics.

i have a simplified programming language for kids. The language has it's own REPL/Shell and is more kind of text based.

https://github.com/MoserMichael/jscriptparse

Would like to get some feedback. (i think it's a swell little language)

Shell scripting is fine, but some things are just hard.

So here is my attempt of writing another shell:

https://github.com/MoserMichael/jscriptparse

- it has a Repl

Interesting perspective

https://github.com/MoserMichael/jscriptparse - this is my pet project, it's an educational / shell scripting language. It tries to allow for concise expression, and you have a REPL/shell.

Ideally I want to fit this niche as well, where you can solve these problems in a concise manner.

Here is the tutorial: https://github.com/MoserMichael/jscriptparse/blob/main/PYXTU...

i am working on PYX - an education programming language with REPL / shell.

here: https://github.com/MoserMichael/jscriptparse

and here: https://www.npmjs.com/package/pyxlang

By the way: i see a lot of downloads via npm, don't know if that is due to bot activity or if there is real interest.

This is a new provisioning tool built with https://github.com/purpleidea/mgmt/ that I hope both provides great value and also demonstrates the start of a new way to build certain kinds of software.

Thanks for reading!

I've looked briefly into this project before. Some ideas are similar to what I'm doing in https://github.com/purpleidea/mgmt/ but the really weird thing is that I have no idea who's behind this language. A person? A company? A small group? Are they anonymous for some reason or am I oblivious?

I don't generally believe in orchestrators (they miss the point, things are not single computers and neither is the world) and so I have that feedback here but also for:

> Airflow/Cadence/Temporal/Databuilderframework?

Which don't really think about modelling non-centralized things.

This of course doesn't mean they're not useful, it's just that they don't have what I believe is a good long-term value proposition.

I'm incredibly biased because I'm working on programmatic, real-time modelling of distributed systems with https://github.com/purpleidea/mgmt/

The DAG concurrency stuff feels familiar to what I've been doing with our language, mcl. https://github.com/purpleidea/mgmt/

Our goal is NOT a general-purpose turing-complete language like this one is, but we do some amazing lock-free, DAG concurrency things to achieve the processing wins.

I don't think it's good news, but why is anyone surprised? Nobody wants to pay for open source.

Companies want it for free, and individuals don't have enough luxury time to be able to do it themselves.

Prove me wrong and help patch or fund https://github.com/purpleidea/mgmt/ and you'll have an even better replacement for terraform!

Individual here, not a company. We'd love contributors to https://github.com/purpleidea/mgmt/

Eventually decided puppet wasn't a good enough tool to be able to autonomously deploy and continuously manage such clusters. So I started working on this https://github.com/purpleidea/mgmt/ project. Not quite MVP yet, but trying to get there soon. Got distracted along the way with having to work real jobs (Red Hat, Amazon) to pay bills.

Yeah, that project is pretty much at the bottom of my list, unfortunately. My top projects these days are mgmt, klister, recursion-schemes, and hint... And that's already too much!

There are certainly faster alternatives out there (mgmt comes to mind) but then, they're not Ansible.