jpeg-xl VS libjxl

shit i did not know that.. does it also work well with wordpress etc? because the only downfall of avif is bunch of extra steps on a nginx to get it to work right.. Also, u/LITUATUI 's comment, do i just change avif to jpeg-xl? i found something but didnt fully finish reading yet https://github.com/ImageMagick/jpeg-xl

One of the most interesting things to me is that JPEG-XL is under an open Patent License, unlike the original JPEG.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JPEG_XL

Also, Google contributed quite a bit to it's development. As the patent grants show:

https://github.com/ImageMagick/jpeg-xl/blob/main/PATENTS

https://github.com/libjxl/libjxl/blob/main/PATENTS

Microsoft seemed to have gotten a patent on part of it's implementation (which Google also tried to get). Not sure if Google will pay to invalidate that patent, but I have a feeling they are more likely to defend AVIF.

https://www.theregister.com/2022/02/17/microsoft_ans_patent/

Google's control is a little concerning, but I do feel there are bigger fish to fry then choosing between two free formats. Like H.264 and H.265 patents.

https://github.com/libjxl/libjxl/blob/main/doc/format_overvi... is a pretty detailed but good overview. The highlights are variable size DCT (up to 128x128), ANS entropy prediction, and chroma from luminance prediction. https://github.com/libjxl/libjxl/blob/main/doc/encode_effort... also gives a good breakdown of features by effort level.

For JPEG XL, refer to its format overview [1]. In short its lossless mode uses a combination of multiple techniques: the rANS coding with an alias table, LZ77, reversible color transforms, a general vector quantization that subsumes palettes, a modified Haar transform and a learnable meta-adaptive decision tree for context modelling.

One good thing about JPEG XL is that its lossy mode also largely uses the same tool, with a major addition of specialized quantization and context modelling for low- and high-frequenty components.

[1] https://github.com/libjxl/libjxl/blob/main/doc/format_overvi...

The cjxl source is here. If you spot any reason why -x strip=exif may not work, tell me.

The problem is that the instructions for actually running the WASM file are not that clear... the docs the author mentions shows how to compile to WASM, which is easy enough, but then here's the instructions to make that actually work in the browser:

https://github.com/libjxl/libjxl/blob/main/tools/wasm_demo/R...

Yeah, you need some mysterious Python script, a JS service worker at runtime, choose whether you want the WASM or WASM_SIMD target, use a browser that supports Threads and SIMD if you chose that, make sure to serve everything with the appropriate custom HTTP headers... just reading that, I can see that to get this stuff working on non-browser WASM targets would likely require expertise in WASM, which is the point of the OP. WASM's UX is just not there yet.

https://github.com/libjxl/libjxl#usage

> Specifically for JPEG files, the default cjxl behavior is to apply lossless recompression and the default djxl behavior is to reconstruct the original JPEG file (when the extension of the output file is .jpg).

I mean compiling a bleeding edge kicad, inkscape or jpeg-xl is easy. But will probably trash your system if you already have an older version installed.

But you look at your image viewer that could have the lossless indicator? (and there is an issue open to add this indicator to the jxl files)

https://github.com/libjxl/libjxl/issues/432

You might want to use libjxl directly, e.g. for visually lossless images: cjxl --effort 9 --brotli_effort 11 --distance 1.0 --num_threads (nproc) --lossless_jpeg 0 input.png output.jxl on linux (if you're on windows/mac, just replace the (nproc) with the number of cpu threads you have, e.g. --num_threads 16).