jp
Task
Our great sponsors
jp | Task | |
---|---|---|
6 | 113 | |
716 | 10,017 | |
1.8% | 4.9% | |
1.1 | 9.6 | |
11 months ago | 4 days ago | |
Python | MDX | |
Apache License 2.0 | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
jp
-
Jq Internals: Backtracking
I have a hard time suggesting such a thing, because I find JMESPath incredibly inferior to jq's expressiveness, but if you're in the AWS ecosystem much, you may enjoy https://github.com/jmespath/jp#readme which uses the same query language as does awscli (https://docs.aws.amazon.com/cli/latest/userguide/cli-usage-f...). That may at least pay more dividends than keeping jq's language in your head where it will only ever be used by jq
-
using JQ to parse output
Have you tried this utility instead: https://github.com/jmespath/jp
- Zq: An Easier (and Faster) Alternative to Jq
- What tools did you discover that made your work so much easier for DevOps & SRE
-
FX: An interactive alternative to jq to process JSON
There’s also jp, which interprets JMESPath: https://github.com/jmespath/jp
This one has the advantage of being natively understood by aws-cli, meaning you can pass a JMESPath to an AWS call and only receive the filtered / transformed result back.
- Tips on Adding JSON Output to Your CLI App
Task
-
Show HN: Workflow Orchestrator in Golang
So many tools in this space! This one looks a little bit like go-task, but it seems maybe better for production workflows because if timeout support, while go-task seems more aimed to command line work/makefile replacement.
—-
https://github.com/go-task/task
-
Essential Command Line Tools for Developers
View on GitHub
- Task: A task runner / alternative to GNU Make
-
Using Make – writing less Makefile
A similar tool is `task` https://taskfile.dev/ . It is quite capable and also a single executable. I've grown to quite like it.
-
What’s with DevOps engineers using `make` of all things?
check out tasks - a bit of a learning curve but arguably more powerful imo
-
Go Development with Hot Reload Using Taskfile
That's when I came across taskfile.dev. Task is an automation tool designed to be more accessible than other options, such as GNU Make.
-
Poetry (Packaging) in motion
Full disclosure, I did not review Conda or Hatch fully. Not that there is anything explicitly wrong with either of them. Conda is too specific to the scientific community for my general taste. Hatch seems to go well with Conda and also uses the PyProject manifest as well. It's nice that it gives you several built in tools, similar to commit hooks, but I tend to like to roll my own via a Taskfile and run them with Poetry.
-
Building RESTful API with Hexagonal Architecture in Go
Taskfile is a tool for streamlining repetitive development tasks. It helps automate activities like building, testing, and deploying applications. Unlike Makefile, Taskfile uses YAML for configuration, making it more readable and user-friendly.
-
We built the fastest CI in the world. It failed
9. We test everything with another promotion which runs make targets which build docker containers to run python scripts (pytest)
This is also built by a complicated web of wildcarded makefile targets, which need to be interoperable and support a few if/else cases for specific components.
My plan is to migrate all of this to something simpler and more straightforward, or at least more maintainable, which is honestly probably going to turn into taskfile[0] instead of makefiles, and then simple python scripts for the glue that ties everything together or does more complex logic.
My hope is that it can be more straightforward and easier to maintain, with more component-ized logic, but realistically every step in that labyrinthine build process (and that's just the open-source version!) came from a decision made by a very talented team of engineers who know far more about the process and the product than I do. At this point I'm wondering if it would make 'more sense' to replace it with a giant python script of some kind and get access to all the logic we need all at once (it would not).
[0] https://taskfile.dev/
-
Exploring GCP With Terraform: Setting Up The Environment And Project
task - a task runner and a replacement for make
What are some alternatives?
jq - Command-line JSON processor
just - 🤖 Just a command runner
jq - Command-line JSON processor [Moved to: https://github.com/jqlang/jq]
doit - task management & automation tool
fx - Terminal JSON viewer & processor
goreleaser - Deliver Go binaries as fast and easily as possible
jet - CLI to transform between JSON, EDN, YAML and Transit using Clojure
boilr - :zap: boilerplate template manager that generates files or directories from template repositories
scout - Reading and writing in JSON, Plist, YAML and XML data made simple when the data format is not known at build time. Swift library and command-line tool.
JobRunner - Framework for performing work asynchronously, outside of the request flow
jid - json incremental digger
taskctl - Concurrent task runner, developer's routine tasks automation toolkit. Simple modern alternative to GNU Make 🧰