jmh VS javawriter

JMH for benchmarks

I would recommend using JMH instead.

Reflection is probably very roughly between 10 and 1000 times slower. Why don't you measure it yourself using JMH?

Aleksey Shipilev is another such leader, whom is especially knowledgeable about the internals of the JVM. His writings are invaluable. He is (was) the lead of the Java microbenchmark framework (JMH} which is how one would write small performance experiments in Java, and learn what really makes a difference or now.

In the last episode we implemented a parallelMap operation using streams, raw threads, a threadpool with futures, and coroutines. At first glance the raw threads was quickest, followed by futures, coroutines and then streams. In this, part 56 of an exploration of where a Test Driven Development implementation of the Gilded Rose stock control system might take us in Kotlin, we investigate the performance of the different functions further, in particular digging down into why coroutines seem to be slow and finding a way to speed them up. We also find a way to use a particular ForkJoinPool to run the streams code, making it as fast as the others (bar the raw threads). Frankly we only use very rough benchmarks here, with no statistical testing except 'it looks like'. That's OK for gross differences, but is highly suspect when deciding which of two similarly performant approaches is faster. For that check out JMH and you could watch my video from KotlinConf 2017

A few months ago, we started to use JMH in our project to test and find performance issues. The tool provides multiple modes and profilers, and we found this useful for our purposes.

javapoet (for generating code in Java): square/javapoet: A Java API for generating .java source files. (github.com)

Resources: 1. Spring Boot Official Documentation on configuring multiple data sources: Spring Boot Reference Documentation 2. javapoet (for generating code in Java): square/javapoet: A Java API for generating .java source files. (github.com) 3. Guide to Annotation Processing in Java: Java Annotation Processing and Creating a Builder | Baeldung

Javapoet. This helped me a lot, because i wrote two generators, one for one employer, who don't like dynamic generators, so the first was to generate mappers like mapstruct does; from model to pojos and viceversa. The second one was a static testing pojo factory generator; this last one i made public (it's pretty basic and now we have projects like instancio and podam) its name is mother-factory.

> can you show an example of how you'd parse, say, a .java.in

The canonical way to do such a thing is through the java annotation processing api [1] and using a tool like java poet [2]. Before you did that, you'd probably decide if you wanted to instead use bytecode generation with a library like bytebuddy [3]

But, assuming for some reason, you wanted to torture yourself and actually consume a java.in file and apply a regex, then you'd probably pull out the "maven-replacer-plugin" [4] and configure that for the task at hand. (or use your favorite templating language plugin. There's a million of them).

Though, to be fair, this really isn't something that comes up in regular java programming due to the nature of the ecosystem. Anything you'd want to codegen likely already has a library and anything you didn't would receive (legitimate) push back.

[1] https://www.baeldung.com/java-annotation-processing-builder

[2] https://github.com/square/javapoet

[3] https://bytebuddy.net/

[4] https://github.com/beiliubei/maven-replacer-plugin

I’ve used a maven archetype before with velocitemplate. That solution was iffy so we then migrated to using https://github.com/square/javapoet to generate the java source and write it to the desired files. I think we also used the google formatter library so the files would be formatted after generating.

JavaPoet