jmh VS go

Compare jmh vs go and see what are their differences.

jmh (by openjdk)


The Go programming language (by golang)
Our great sponsors
  • - Learn 300+ open source libraries for free using AI.
  • WorkOS - The modern API for authentication & user identity.
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
jmh go
25 2047
1,913 117,952
3.2% 1.1%
6.6 9.9
7 days ago 6 days ago
Java Go
GNU General Public License v3.0 only BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.


Posts with mentions or reviews of jmh. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-05-27.


Posts with mentions or reviews of go. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-02-24.
  • Fast persistent recoverable log and key-value store
    3 projects | | 24 Feb 2024
    Of course it does: just call TCPConn.SetNoDelay(false).


  • Go + Hypermedia - A Learning Journey (Part 1)
    6 projects | | 23 Feb 2024
    Go - programming language
  • Delving Deeper: Enriching Microservices with Golang with CloudWeGo
    7 projects | | 22 Feb 2024
    Built for the modern development landscape by embracing both Golang and Rust, CloudWeGo delivers advanced features and excellent performance metrics. As proof of its performance, benchmark tests have shown that Kitex surpasses gRPC by over 4 times in terms of QPS and latency, with a throughput increased by 51% - 70% in terms of QPS (Queries Per Second) and latency.
  • A beginner's guide to constant-time cryptography (2017)
    6 projects | | 22 Feb 2024
    I noticed in July of 2022 that Go did exactly the vulnerable example and reported it to the security team.

    It was fixed as of Go 1.21


    The article cites JavaScript, which is not constant time. There's no sure way to do constant time operations in JavaScript and thus no secure way to do crypto directly in Javascript. Browsers like Firefox depend on low level calls which should be implemented in languages that are constant time capable.

    JavaScript needs something like constant time WASM in order to do crypto securely, but seeing the only constant time WASM project on GitHub has only 16 stars and the last commit was 2 years ago, it doesn't appear to have much interest.

    However, for JavaScript, I recommend Paul's library Noble which is "hardened to be algorithmically constant time". It is by far the best library available for JavaScript.

  • Maybe Everything Is a Coroutine
    3 projects | | 14 Feb 2024
    > Channels are specifically designed to be a high-speed data bus between goroutines, rather than ever use more expensive and less safe shared memory.

    What do you mean? Shared memory is not more expensive. Memory is memory, it's either cached on your core or not. In fact, Go still has to issue fence instructions to ensure that the memory it observes after a channel read is sequenced after any writes to that memory, so it's at best the same cost you'd have with other forms of inter-thread communication in any language.

    Anyway, even that is missing the point. Go still shares memory if you used a reference type, and most types in Go end up being reference types, because it's the only way to have a variable-sized data structure (and while we're at it, string is the only variable-sized data structure that's also immutable).

    The bigger problem is that Go doesn't enforce thread safety. Channels only make communication safe if you send types that don't contain any mutable references... but Go doesn't give you any way to define your own immutable types. That basically limits you to just string. Instead people send slices, maps, pointers to structs, interfaces, etc. and those are all mutable and Go does nothing to enforce that you didn't mutate them.

    Even if all of that somehow wasn't true, many parallelism patterns simply don't map well to channels, so you still end up with mutexes in many parts of real world projects. Even if you don't see the mutexes, they're in your libraries. For example, Go's http.Transport contains a connection pool, but it uses mutexes instead of channels because even the Go team knows that mutexes still make sense for many real-world patterns.

    This whole "channels make Go safe" myth has to stop. It's confused a generation of Go programmers about the actual safety (and apparently performance) tradeoffs of channels. They do not make Go safer (mutable references are still mutable after being sent on a channel), they do not make it faster (the memory still has to be fenced), and heck while we're at it, they do not even make it simpler ("idiomatic" use of channels introduces many ways that goroutines can deadlock, and deadlock-free use of channels is much more complicated and less idiomatic).

    The most useful thing about channels is that you can select{} on multiple of them so they partly compensate for Go's limitations around selecting on futures in general. They're a poor substitute when you actually needed to select on something like IO, where io.Reader/Writer still don't interact with select, channels, or even cancellation directly.

  • Context Control in Go
    2 projects | | 9 Feb 2024
  • Go 1.22 Release Notes
    5 projects | | 6 Feb 2024
    Is the memory issue reported in go 1.21 version in linux OS resolved in go 1.22?

    5 projects | | 6 Feb 2024
    Server 2012 was dropped in and it's still in security support. My numbers are somewhat similar to @olivielpeau in that thread.
  • Copilot: Weapon For Laid Back Developers
    2 projects | | 6 Feb 2024
    In my example you can see some code written in Go and I have highlighted the function I am interested in. On the left side I have my Copilot Chat interface opened and all I have to do is type /explain and Copilot will explain what the function does. And since this is chat interface, it is of course possible to ask follow up questions. Pretty powerful, right?
  • Launch HN: Diversion (YC S22) – Cloud-Native Git Alternative
    5 projects | | 22 Jan 2024
    Considering many languages' very own tooling (e.g. gofmt, syn) often have glaring gaps[1][2] in the understanding/roundtripping of the language's AST constructs, I would never be able to trust something like this to store my code.


What are some alternatives?

When comparing jmh and go you can also consider the following projects:

v - Simple, fast, safe, compiled language for developing maintainable software. Compiles itself in <1s with zero library dependencies. Supports automatic C => V translation.

TinyGo - Go compiler for small places. Microcontrollers, WebAssembly (WASM/WASI), and command-line tools. Based on LLVM.

zig - General-purpose programming language and toolchain for maintaining robust, optimal, and reusable software.

Nim - Nim is a statically typed compiled systems programming language. It combines successful concepts from mature languages like Python, Ada and Modula. Its design focuses on efficiency, expressiveness, and elegance (in that order of priority).

Angular - Deliver web apps with confidence 🚀

golang-developer-roadmap - Roadmap to becoming a Go developer in 2020

RxGo - Reactive Extensions for the Go language.

React - The library for web and native user interfaces.

crystal - The Crystal Programming Language

grule-rule-engine - Rule engine implementation in Golang

sqlc - Generate type-safe code from SQL

rust - Empowering everyone to build reliable and efficient software.