-
keepassxc
KeePassXC is a cross-platform community-driven port of the Windows application “Keepass Password Safe”.
Heh, this comment reminded me of those "The Tao of ..." - in your case Make; "smack, and the novice was thus enlightened" :-D
Based on your PoV, I'm guessing pkg-config is similarly misguided, since those fools allow the end user to specify the prefix, includedir, libdir, and any cflags and ldflags for ther setup. Pssh, idiots. If they'd just "sudo make install" everything, they'd be enlightened
> Presumably all of those are tested in CI on each PR?
Clearly not "2^26 possibilities," but not "linux/amd64 or gtfo" either: https://github.com/keepassxreboot/keepassxc/releases/tag/2.7...
-
InfluxDB
InfluxDB – Built for High-Performance Time Series Workloads. InfluxDB 3 OSS is now GA. Transform, enrich, and act on time series data directly in the database. Automate critical tasks and eliminate the need to move data externally. Download now.
-
CMake needs to go
There are much better alternatives:
https://xmake.io/
-
> I also never got why we need DSLs for build systems
The same reason they show up anywhere: to have the correct level of abstraction, or its cousin "signal/noise ratio." Trying to debug "gcc -o build build.cc && ./build" sounds like the 8th circle of hell to me. I can show a concrete example: https://github.com/facebook/sapling/blob/0.1.20221201-095354... So, when this raises OSError or FileNotFoundError due to some botched assumption, I guess one just attaches pdb to it and now your job is to be a python expert
Or, my other favorite "what is wrong with you:" https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/file/FIREFOX_NIGHTLY_...
Or, so as to not just be hating on python, this junk: https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/blob/v1.48.33/package... and its https://github.com/brave/brave-core/blob/master/build/comman... friend
All of those are in a general purpose programming language, and they require spelunking through thousands of lines of code to surface the actual commands and dependencies that are buried therein. And, if you become a domain expert in mach, where else are you going to apply that expertise?
-
> I also never got why we need DSLs for build systems
The same reason they show up anywhere: to have the correct level of abstraction, or its cousin "signal/noise ratio." Trying to debug "gcc -o build build.cc && ./build" sounds like the 8th circle of hell to me. I can show a concrete example: https://github.com/facebook/sapling/blob/0.1.20221201-095354... So, when this raises OSError or FileNotFoundError due to some botched assumption, I guess one just attaches pdb to it and now your job is to be a python expert
Or, my other favorite "what is wrong with you:" https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/file/FIREFOX_NIGHTLY_...
Or, so as to not just be hating on python, this junk: https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/blob/v1.48.33/package... and its https://github.com/brave/brave-core/blob/master/build/comman... friend
All of those are in a general purpose programming language, and they require spelunking through thousands of lines of code to surface the actual commands and dependencies that are buried therein. And, if you become a domain expert in mach, where else are you going to apply that expertise?
-
brave-core
Core engine for the Brave browser for mobile and desktop. For issues https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/issues
> I also never got why we need DSLs for build systems
The same reason they show up anywhere: to have the correct level of abstraction, or its cousin "signal/noise ratio." Trying to debug "gcc -o build build.cc && ./build" sounds like the 8th circle of hell to me. I can show a concrete example: https://github.com/facebook/sapling/blob/0.1.20221201-095354... So, when this raises OSError or FileNotFoundError due to some botched assumption, I guess one just attaches pdb to it and now your job is to be a python expert
Or, my other favorite "what is wrong with you:" https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/file/FIREFOX_NIGHTLY_...
Or, so as to not just be hating on python, this junk: https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/blob/v1.48.33/package... and its https://github.com/brave/brave-core/blob/master/build/comman... friend
All of those are in a general purpose programming language, and they require spelunking through thousands of lines of code to surface the actual commands and dependencies that are buried therein. And, if you become a domain expert in mach, where else are you going to apply that expertise?
-
> can you show an example of how you'd parse, say, a .java.in
The canonical way to do such a thing is through the java annotation processing api [1] and using a tool like java poet [2]. Before you did that, you'd probably decide if you wanted to instead use bytecode generation with a library like bytebuddy [3]
But, assuming for some reason, you wanted to torture yourself and actually consume a java.in file and apply a regex, then you'd probably pull out the "maven-replacer-plugin" [4] and configure that for the task at hand. (or use your favorite templating language plugin. There's a million of them).
Though, to be fair, this really isn't something that comes up in regular java programming due to the nature of the ecosystem. Anything you'd want to codegen likely already has a library and anything you didn't would receive (legitimate) push back.
[1] https://www.baeldung.com/java-annotation-processing-builder
[2] https://github.com/square/javapoet
[3] https://bytebuddy.net/
[4] https://github.com/beiliubei/maven-replacer-plugin
-
> can you show an example of how you'd parse, say, a .java.in
The canonical way to do such a thing is through the java annotation processing api [1] and using a tool like java poet [2]. Before you did that, you'd probably decide if you wanted to instead use bytecode generation with a library like bytebuddy [3]
But, assuming for some reason, you wanted to torture yourself and actually consume a java.in file and apply a regex, then you'd probably pull out the "maven-replacer-plugin" [4] and configure that for the task at hand. (or use your favorite templating language plugin. There's a million of them).
Though, to be fair, this really isn't something that comes up in regular java programming due to the nature of the ecosystem. Anything you'd want to codegen likely already has a library and anything you didn't would receive (legitimate) push back.
[1] https://www.baeldung.com/java-annotation-processing-builder
[2] https://github.com/square/javapoet
[3] https://bytebuddy.net/
[4] https://github.com/beiliubei/maven-replacer-plugin
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
-
> can you show an example of how you'd parse, say, a .java.in
The canonical way to do such a thing is through the java annotation processing api [1] and using a tool like java poet [2]. Before you did that, you'd probably decide if you wanted to instead use bytecode generation with a library like bytebuddy [3]
But, assuming for some reason, you wanted to torture yourself and actually consume a java.in file and apply a regex, then you'd probably pull out the "maven-replacer-plugin" [4] and configure that for the task at hand. (or use your favorite templating language plugin. There's a million of them).
Though, to be fair, this really isn't something that comes up in regular java programming due to the nature of the ecosystem. Anything you'd want to codegen likely already has a library and anything you didn't would receive (legitimate) push back.
[1] https://www.baeldung.com/java-annotation-processing-builder
[2] https://github.com/square/javapoet
[3] https://bytebuddy.net/
[4] https://github.com/beiliubei/maven-replacer-plugin
