jelly-actix-web-starter
redwood
jelly-actix-web-starter | redwood | |
---|---|---|
15 | 114 | |
225 | 16,734 | |
- | 0.2% | |
0.0 | 10.0 | |
over 1 year ago | 5 days ago | |
Rust | TypeScript | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
jelly-actix-web-starter
-
Any actix-web scaffold?
You can look at https://github.com/secretkeysio/jelly-actix-web-starter
-
Actix Web v4.0 (Rust)
My usual reminder that I have a Django-ish template for actix-web that I maintain: https://github.com/secretkeysio/jelly-actix-web-starter
Now that actix-web 4.0 is out I should be able to finally resolve one of the open issues/PRs, which I was waiting on 4.0 for.
- Which Rust web framework to choose in 2022 (with code examples)
-
The 10 books that helped me, as a hobbyist, on my journey to learn Rust to re-code a Django application
For those interested in Django-in-Rust type approaches, I maintain an actix-web starter project that does exactly this: https://github.com/secretkeysio/jelly-actix-web-starter
-
An Introduction To Session-Based Authentication In Rust | Zero To Production In Rust #10.5
I maintain a starter for all of this kind of stuff on top of actix-web, for anyone interested: https://github.com/secretkeysio/jelly-actix-web-starter/
-
Announcing actix-web-flash-messages: a port of Django's messages framework to actix-web
Curious why you went with the mailbox approach - since a request is pretty much in-and-out, I found it sufficient to just write a trait for HttpRequest and have a custom render(...) method that pulls any flash messages from the session, thus clearing them. Wouldn't surprise me if I'm missing something tho.
- Ask HN: Go-To Web Stack Today?
-
Trillium web framework
I love Askama, but being tied to compile time changes is an absurd handicap on a web framework in the initial iteration phase. With Tera, you can implement a watcher for template changes and reload them without needing to recompile the entire framework.
-
What’s everyone working on this week (12/2021)?
If you want, I have an open source actix-web repo that does stuff like this for you already.
-
Rust as a Flask API replacement? + performance benefits?
If you enjoy Python's web story but want something similar-ish in Rust, you can check out my actix boilerplate repo - it "mimics" Django in many ways. If nothing else, might be useful for picking apart.
redwood
-
Release Radar • February 2024 Edition
Frameworks are a theme with this month's Release Radar, so here's another. Redwood is a full-stack, JavaScript/TypeScript web application, designed to scale with you. It uses React frontend for the frontend and links to a custom GraphQL API for the backend. The latest version includes a bunch of breaking changes such as moving to Node 20.0, the Redwood Studio, and highly requested GraphQL features such as Realtime, Fragments, and Trusted Documents, the server file, new router hooks, and heaps more. If you've previously used Redwood, you'll probably want to upgrade to version 7.0. The team have put together a handy migration guide for you to follow.
-
The Current State of React Server Components: A Guide for the Perplexed
The other piece of important information to acknowledge here is that when we say RSCs need a framework, “framework” effectively just means “Next.js.” There are some smaller frameworks (like Waku) that support RSCs. There are also some larger and more established frameworks (like Redwood) that have plans to support RSCs or (like Gatsby) only support RSCs in beta. We will likely see this change once we get React 19 and RSCs are part of the Stable version. However, for now, Next.js is currently the only framework recommended in the official React docs that supports server components.
-
What will happen to the full-stack framework in the future?
Although there are quite a few opinionated battery-included frameworks that have picked up everything for you like RedwoodJS, Blitz, and Create-T3-App, you still need to choose between them and hope that they will remain mainstream and well-maintained in the future. So how should we choose?
-
NextJS vs RedwoodJS
Web development frameworks in JavaScript, such as NextJS and RedwoodJS, have gained popularity among developers. Choosing the right framework, library, or tool for a project is crucial for efficient development. Developers often seek the best tools to save time and avoid reinventing the wheel.
-
Ask HN: I'm abandoning NextJS. What's an alternative full-stack TS solution?
The community here is pretty friendly. https://redwoodjs.com/
-
Is Next.js 13 + RSC a Good Choice? I Built an App Without Client-Side Javascript to Find Out
Next.js 13 ignited the first wave of attention to React Server Components (RSC) around the end of last year. Over time, other frameworks, like Remix and RedwoodJS, have also started to put RSC into their future road maps. However, the entire "moving computation to the server-side" direction of React/Next.js has been highly controversial from the very beginning.
-
Enhancing Redwood: A Guide to Implementing Zod for Data Validation and Schema Sharing Between the API and Web Layers
I'm currently experimenting with the fantastic Redwood framework. However, while going through the excellent tutorial, I didn't find any guidance on using data validation libraries like Yup, Zod, Vest, etc. So, I had to do some investigation and came up with a solution. This article describes the implementation of validation with Zod in a fresh Redwood app. You can find the sources at this github repository.
-
ZenStack: The Complete Authorization Solution for Prisma Projects
RBAC is one of the most common authorization models - users are assigned different roles, and resource access privileges are controlled at the role level. Despite its limitations, RBAC is a popular choice for simple applications, and some frameworks (like RedwoodJS) have built-in support for it.
-
🏆 Top 5 full-stack JS frameworks in 2023 - which one should you pick for your next project? 🤔
Check it out here: https://redwoodjs.com/
- RedwoodJS: The App Framework for Startups
What are some alternatives?
uWebSockets.js - μWebSockets for Node.js back-ends :metal:
remix - Build Better Websites. Create modern, resilient user experiences with web fundamentals.
poem - A full-featured and easy-to-use web framework with the Rust programming language.
Next.js - The React Framework
sailfish - Simple, small, and extremely fast template engine for Rust
Blitz - ⚡️ The Missing Fullstack Toolkit for Next.js
yew - Rust / Wasm framework for creating reliable and efficient web applications
Nest - A progressive Node.js framework for building efficient, scalable, and enterprise-grade server-side applications with TypeScript/JavaScript 🚀
miniserve - 🌟 For when you really just want to serve some files over HTTP right now!
Gatsby - The best React-based framework with performance, scalability and security built in.
chrono - Date and time library for Rust
Strapi - 🚀 Strapi is the leading open-source headless CMS. It’s 100% JavaScript/TypeScript, fully customizable and developer-first.