jamulus VS score

Full disclosure - I've never tried to use this, but I remember hearing about it a lot during COVID lockdowns: https://jamulus.io/

Last I used was jamulus https://jamulus.io/

Jamulus https://jamulus.io/ worked pretty well with our choir during the pandemic. If the server is powerful enough it can support many singers. We did a test with the German Barbershop Association with 100 singer: http://barbershop.de/en/content/soi-projekt[https://jamulus.io/](https://jamulus.io/) worked pretty well with our choir during the pandemic. If the server is powerful enough it can support many singers. We did a test with the German Barbershop Association with 100 singers: http://barbershop.de/en/content/soi-projekt

You may want to try Jamulus. It has lower latency than Zoom etc and allows people in different locations to play together in real time. There are detailed instructions on how to install and configure it to work with your DAW and audio interface.

Next on my agenda: Check out https://jamulus.io/ and see if I can find some online jam sessions.

Jamulus is a very cool project and I was blown away by how jamming over the internet was not just usable but actually enjoyable.

https://github.com/jamulussoftware/jamulus

"Zero latency" is impossible, but I'd definitely say YES for low-enough latency (under 30ms at more than 500Km) to have a solid experience. Check out koord.live, or jamulus.io or sonobus.net for good and free real-time remote rehearsals.

I haven't had the opportunity to try this software myself, but I've seen Jamulus thrown around in these discussions before: https://jamulus.io/

https://ossia.io uses widgets and qgraphicsscene for the main UI rendering and Qt rhi for the GPU pipeline, and it's performing well enough for our use-cases - I was working on it on a 1080p screen on a Pi4 recently and it certainly felt much much faster and responsive than chrome on the same hardware.

I use it for live c++ recompilation in https://ossia.io - all the code is in there. https://github.com/ossia/score/tree/master/src/plugins/score-plugin-jit/JitCpp

> I feel like visual programming gets a bad rap because of things like this. As an electronic engineer that used to love LabView and life long user of NI Reaktor and Max/MSP, those tools are fantastic if you don’t approach them with an imperative programming mindset.

aha, in the long run I ended up making https://ossia.io which is as VPL as it can get. Yet it still embeds a LOT of textual languages.

For me both VSCode and CLion lag heavily.. whenver I tried CLion it was completely unuseable on my project https://ossia.io which is only 500kloc (and I try to try it pretty much once a year since it was in beta)

https://ossia.io does some of it, I've been working on a new release that also supports the whole QtQuick stack in the node graph items but you can already combine videos & shader effects

In https://ossia.io with PCH, using clang, ninja, mold, and some artificial split in shared libraries for development builds, I get a compile-edit-run cycle of a couple seconds in general... I wouldn't say it's too much of a problem if you use the tools already available

If you're interested in multimedia https://ossia.io is always looking for new contributors!

Tools like Ossia Score, Chataigne and PureData (pd) can also help a ton in building interactive art and triggering other A/V software.

here's a simple example of how to do it in https://ossia.io score : https://streamable.com/wkklek