ipython VS prettier

If you’re already using ipython, this isn’t a problem because you’ll already need to download most of these dependencies anyway. But if you’re not using ipython… you’ll still need to download those dependencies.

!pip install is error-prone, it is better to use %pip install, ipython even warns about this, https://github.com/ipython/ipython/pull/12954/

The git history (here is the git blame) shows it has not been updated in 9 year. Looks like a documentation issue that you should open an issue against.

Do you know IPython? It is a modern Python console that extends the capabilities of the classic builtin Python shell by offering introspection, tab completion, syntaxing coloring, as well as history. If you don't know it, I can't recommend it enough. More information can be found in its GitHub page.

There is an IPython ticket on GitHub on the topic, but it's unclear if the problem has been solved.

For further documentation on ipython using the CLI, you can refer to the GitHub link or the documentation page.

> ??????_ Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/nvaughn4/bin/miniconda3/envs/newprime/bin/ipython", line 11, in sys.exit(start_ipython()) File "/home/nvaughn4/bin/miniconda3/envs/newprime/lib/python3.6/site-packages/IPython/__init__.py", line 126, in start_ipython return launch_new_instance(argv=argv, **kwargs) File "/home/nvaughn4/bin/miniconda3/envs/newprime/lib/python3.6/site-packages/traitlets/config/application.py", line 658, in launch_instance app.start() File "/home/nvaughn4/bin/miniconda3/envs/newprime/lib/python3.6/site-packages/IPython/terminal/ipapp.py", line 356, in start self.shell.mainloop() File "/home/nvaughn4/bin/miniconda3/envs/newprime/lib/python3.6/site-packages/IPython/terminal/interactiveshell.py", line 563, in mainloop self.interact() File "/home/nvaughn4/bin/miniconda3/envs/newprime/lib/python3.6/site-packages/IPython/terminal/interactiveshell.py", line 554, in interact self.run_cell(code, store_history=True) File "/home/nvaughn4/bin/miniconda3/envs/newprime/lib/python3.6/site-packages/IPython/core/interactiveshell.py", line 2858, in run_cell raw_cell, store_history, silent, shell_futures) File "/home/nvaughn4/bin/miniconda3/envs/newprime/lib/python3.6/site-packages/IPython/core/interactiveshell.py", line 2880, in _run_cell elif self.should_run_async(raw_cell): File "/home/nvaughn4/bin/miniconda3/envs/newprime/lib/python3.6/site-packages/IPython/core/interactiveshell.py", line 2918, in should_run_async return _should_be_async(cell) File "/home/nvaughn4/bin/miniconda3/envs/newprime/lib/python3.6/site-packages/IPython/core/async_helpers.py", line 161, in _should_be_async code = compile(cell, "<>", "exec") UnicodeEncodeError: 'utf-8' codec can't encode characters in position 537-542: surrogates not allowed If you suspect this is an IPython 7.15.0 bug, please report it at: https://github.com/ipython/ipython/issues or send an email to the mailing list at [email protected] You can print a more detailed traceback right now with "%tb", or use "%debug" to interactively debug it. Extra-detailed tracebacks for bug-reporting purposes can be enabled via: %config Application.verbose_crash=True sys:1: RuntimeWarning: coroutine 'InteractiveShell.run_cell_async' was never awaited

There’s one I’ve come across recently here where you’re fighting against syntax highlighting with extra error context. https://github.com/ipython/ipython/issues/13446#issuecomment...

I see. https://github.com/ipython/ipython/issues/13529

You can automate setup for developers using this simple script:

https://github.com/ipython/ipython/pull/12091/files

And here’s a GitLab issue requesting support for blame-ignore:

https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/31423

I don’t think there’s a corresponding GitHub request, but maybe if GitLab adds this feature GitHub will have some incentive to follow suit.

In this post, I also use ESLint + Standard JS as my code formatting tools. Formatting JS/TS code by using ESLint is also subjective and opinionated, arguably most people would rather use Prettier instead, which provides more configurable options.

Let's be honest - setting up tools for a new project can be a frustrating process. Especially when you want to jump straight to coding part. This is often the case with ESLint and Prettier, two popular tools in the JavaScript ecosystem that can sometimes interfere with each other when it comes to code formatting. Fortunately, there's a simple solution to this process, and it's called eslint-plugin-prettier.

From my point of view, Prettier doesn't work well for styling with utility classes. For a discussion see Prettier#7863 or Prettier#5948.

Prettier: An opinionated code formatter that enforces a consistent code style.

Automating code checks with static code analysis allows us to enforce code styling effectively. By integrating tools into our workflow, we can identify errors at an early stage, while coding instead of blocking us at the end. For instance, flake8 checks Python code for style and errors, eslint performs similar checks for JavaScript, and prettier automatically formats code to maintain consistency.

So anyways, I wanted to hook up Emacs with Astro support. For now, I've just been roughing it out there and running Prettier by itself and turning off save on format and auto-complete. It's been scary.

If you're a developer, you're surely familiar with Prettier and ESLint. With over 8 years of existence, they have established themselves as references in the JavaScript ecosystem.

prettier is used to format you text

No formatting inconsistencies: The committed code should follow the organization's code formatting standards(prettier or pretty-quick).

Let’s walk through the steps for a one-time setup to configure husky pre-commit and pre-push hooks, ESLint with code styles conventions, prettier code formatter, and lint-staged. Husky automatically runs a script on each commit or push. This is useful for linting files to enforce code styles that keeps the entire code base following conventions.