io VS zig

Second for smalltalk, also IOLang is super great, and of course the mighty Lua

Hope they will add this link on the site: https://github.com/IoLanguage/io/tree/master/samples/misc

Io and Rebol both have homo-iconicity and a macro system. Would you call them a Lisp? The name "Lisp" is short for "Lisp Processing". No wonder Lisp is the most powerful language in the world, when all powerful languages are secretly Lisp without knowing it!!!

https://iolanguage.org/

For oo/meta I'm partial to IO: https://iolanguage.org, is pretty neat to see how prototypal OO works.

There is an issue proposing this approach: https://github.com/ziglang/zig/issues/4284

https://github.com/ziglang/zig/issues/224

e.g.:

> > When debugging/prototyping, it's useful to comment out a line without having to refactor, e.g.

When writing code in a scripting language, sometimes you need that extra bit of performance (or maybe an async feature from Zig).

NodeJS is by no means a slow runtime, it wouldn’t be so popular if it was. But compared to Bun, it’s slow. Bun was built from the ground up with speed in mind, using both JavascriptCore and Zig. The Bun team spent an enormous amount of time and energy trying to make Bun fast, including lots of profiling, benchmarking, and optimizations.

ntdll.dll!RtlUserThreadStart()

There are valid reasons to use APIs from NTDLL. Where I disagree with zig#1840 is the idea that it is always better to use NTDLL versions of API. Every other software ecosystem uses the standard Win32 APIs and diverging from that without a good reason seems like a good way to have unexpected behavior. One concrete example is most users and programmers expect Windows to redirect some file system paths when running on WOW64. But this is implemented in Kernel32, not ntdll.

https://github.com/ziglang/zig/issues/11894

Zig also has an IRC channel on libera (#zig) that is moderated by Andrew Kelley.[1]

[1] https://github.com/ziglang/zig/wiki/Community