innernet VS mtpng

Innernet is a barebone alternative. https://github.com/tonarino/innernet

Very relatable! At first, I struggled for days trying to make Netmaker or Innernet functional for my personal home server (Raspberry Pi behind multiple routers). But then I stumbled upon ZeroTier, and everything worked seamlessly within a couple of hours. Tailscale was actually the next one on my list because I heard many positive things about it over at r/selfhosted (especially about headscale). However, I did not end up testing it after ZeroTier worked.

Not if you are running wireguard without any management client/server like Netmaker or innernet or any of the many others like them.

I use the GCP free instance as my innernet coordination server (Wireguard mesh vpn). Which is extremely low traffic.

Or why not the open source tool innernet? https://github.com/tonarino/innernet

I wonder if this might improve over a more modern transport, if you were using an IPSec VPN.

Wireguard is enabling us to re-think what's possible over a VPN. Here's an example of what I mean. The network stack is based on Wireguard, with https://github.com/tonarino/innernet providing the topology and identity provisioning.

Virtual Private Network: Innernet, MASQ

That's been done: https://github.com/brion/mtpng#data-flow

I assume iOS may have a problem of the application doing:

    for each path {

Are you required to use PNG or could you save the files in an alternative lossless format [1]? If you're stuck with PNG, mtpng [2] mentioned earlier seems to be significantly faster with multithreading (>40% reduction in encoding times). If you're publishing for web, cwebp might also be a possibility with -mt (multithreading) and -q 25 (lower compression and larger filesize but faster) flags.

[1] https://blender.stackexchange.com/questions/148231/what-imag...

[2] https://github.com/brion/mtpng