injest
babashka
injest | babashka | |
---|---|---|
7 | 112 | |
164 | 3,818 | |
- | 0.9% | |
0.0 | 9.2 | |
about 2 years ago | 4 days ago | |
Clojure | Clojure | |
Eclipse Public License 1.0 | Eclipse Public License 1.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
injest
-
My mental model of Clojure transducers
joinr pointed out this lib to me and it seems to make using them more ergonomic (if you're into pipelining)
https://github.com/johnmn3/injest
However writing your own indeed doesn't sound fun :))
-
Critique of Lazy Sequences in Clojure
As I posted on Reddit:
It might also be good to mention Injest
https://github.com/johnmn3/injest
Which makes transducers more ergonomic to use if you are like me and use threading macros everywhere
Would be curious to hear how others feel about it
-
Understanding transducers
If you don't know how to use transducers, I recommend trying: https://github.com/johnmn3/injest it automatically converts your normal sequence operations to make-use of transducers.
-
Some code examples in Clojure, how to avoid complexity
You can use https://github.com/johnmn3/injest to get threading macros that use transducers.
-
Workshop video: Wrangling Sequences with Injest by John Newman (2021-11-22)
In this 2021-11-22 workshop, John Newman introduced Injest.
-
Workshop: Structure and Interpretation of Clojure Transducers
The transducers workshop by Ben Sless is recommended as background for John Newman's workshop about Injest, which will take place a week later. https://github.com/johnmn3/injest
-
Grokking Clojure transducers
profile and test. sometimes the lazy path is fine, but in general, transducers should be more efficient. there's a recent library that tries to make it somewhat seamless to go between the threading functions with lazy seqs or transducers, called injest.
babashka
-
A Tour of Lisps
It also gives you access to Babashka if you want Clojure for other use-cases where start-up time is an issue
https://babashka.org/
- Babashka: Fast native Clojure scripting runtime
-
What's the value proposition of meta circular interpreters?
I've tried researching this myself and can't find too much. There's this project metaes which is an mci for JS, and there's the SCI module of the Clojure babashka project, but that's about it. I also saw Triska's video on mci but it was pretty theoretical.
-
Adding Dependencies on Clojure Project the Node Way: A Small Intro to neil CLI
Created by the same guy who created babashka which is a way to write bash scripts, node scripts, and even apple scripts using Clojure. A very proficient and influential developer in the Clojure community. This is how borkduke's neil helps us:
- Babashka
-
Pure Bash Bible
Not what you asked for but there is Babashka for scripting in Clojure.
https://github.com/babashka/babashka
-
Critique of Lazy Sequences in Clojure
Clojure's lazy sequences by default are wonderful ergonomically, but it provides many ways to use strict evaluation if you want to. They aren't really a hassle either. I've been doing Clojure for the last few years and have a few grievances, but overall it's the most coherent, well thought out language I've used and I can't recommend it enough.
There is the issue of startup time with the JVM, but you can also do AOT compilation now so that really isn't a problem. Here are some other cool projects to look at if you're interested:
Malli: https://github.com/metosin/malli
Babashka: https://github.com/babashka/babashka
Clerk: https://github.com/nextjournal/clerk
-
Sharpscript: Lisp for Scripting
Being a Clojure addict, I guess I have to leave the obligatory link to Babashka too then: https://github.com/babashka/babashka (Native, fast starting Clojure interpreter for scripting)
-
Rash – The Reckless Racket Shell
which is now on hiatus. babashka: https://babashka.org
-
Are there any languages (that are in common use in companies) and higher-level that give you the same feeling of simplicity and standardization as C?
I've enjoyed babashka for scripting; which is close enough to clojure to allow using some/many libraries; but (probably) not for embedding.
What are some alternatives?
xforms - Extra transducers and reducing fns for Clojure(script)
janet - A dynamic language and bytecode vm
malli - High-performance data-driven data specification library for Clojure/Script.
joker - Small Clojure interpreter, linter and formatter.
nbb - Scripting in Clojure on Node.js using SCI
clojure-lsp - Clojure & ClojureScript Language Server (LSP) implementation
racket - The Racket repository
ShellCheck - ShellCheck, a static analysis tool for shell scripts
hy - A dialect of Lisp that's embedded in Python
ArcadiaGodot
Carp - A statically typed lisp, without a GC, for real-time applications.
immer - Postmodern immutable and persistent data structures for C++ — value semantics at scale