imgbeddings VS haystack

Seconding the recommendation of CLIP embeddings, especially compared to image histograms + requiring OpenCV.

I wrote a naive, minimal dependency Python package to calculate image embeddings (https://github.com/minimaxir/imgbeddings) with some lookup demo notebooks and it works well in a pinch, although it's due for an upgrade.

Normally, this is Hacker News reductiveness, but yes, image classification via CLIP is that easy, especially with Hugging Face's API for it: https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/model_doc/clip

I created a Python package to generate image embeddings from CLIP's vision model (without requiring a ML framework), and a simple linear classifier on those embeddings does the trick: https://github.com/minimaxir/imgbeddings

I was confused for a bit but there is no relation to https://haystack.deepset.ai/

View on GitHub

4. Haystack by Deepset | Github | tutorial

Haystack can be classified as an end-to-end framework for building applications powered by various NLP technologies, including but not limited to generative AI. While it doesn't directly focus on building generative models from scratch, it provides a robust platform for:

But if you want an API that you can use to develop your own flow, Haystack from Deepset could be worth a look.

Haystack for production. We cannot afford breaking changes in our production apps. Its stable, documentation is excellent and did I mention its' STABLE!??

I recently conducted some experiments with Llama2 and Haystack (https://github.com/deepset-ai/haystack), the NLP/LLM framework.

The notebook can be helpful for those trying to load Llama2 on Colab.

1) Installed Transformers from the main branch (and other libraries)