image-background-remove-tool
nixpkgs
| image-background-remove-tool | nixpkgs | |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | 975 | |
| 1,242 | 15,753 | |
| - | 2.8% | |
| 4.3 | 10.0 | |
| 10 days ago | 5 days ago | |
| Python | Nix | |
| Apache License 2.0 | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
image-background-remove-tool
- Show HN: Image background removal without annoying subscriptions
-
Python: Please stop screwing over Linux distros
It was a little bit ago, but I believe I wanted to mess around with this project https://github.com/OPHoperHPO/image-background-remove-tool. There is a requirement.txt but pip3 wouldn't install it. On arch linux, no reason it shouldn't work just ran into dependency issues.
-
Creating an Image Background Removal API (Remove.bg clone) using ⚡Azure Functions⚡
I was looking for a API with which you can remove the background of an image. I found a few and saw that they were pretty expensive. I googled some more and found this repository https://github.com/OPHoperHPO/image-background-remove-tool which does the job pretty well.
-
Google Colab Not using GPU Properly
I would guess this is not a Colab-specific problem, as it appears this issue has been addressed in Github multiple times, inside and outside of Colab.
- Google Colab is Kicking my A$$
- File Not Found Error
nixpkgs
-
Nix: The Breaking Point
I don't think so. The article is probably intended for the Nix community, so the author doesn't need to convince HN that something is going on. If as an outsider you are interested then you need to look into it yourself, the community has no obligation to make their internal conflicts legible to the outside world.
As an outsider myself, it certainly looks like something is going on as more than 20 Nixpkg maintainers left in a week: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues?q=label%3A%228.has%3...
- Maintainers Leaving
-
Air Force picks Anduril, General Atomics to develop unmanned fighter jets
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commits?author=neon-sunset
-
Eelco Dolstra's leadership is corrosive to the Nix project
I see two signers in the top 6 displayed on https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/graphs/contributors
-
3rd Edition of Programming: Principles and Practice Using C++ by Stroustrup
For a single file script, nix can make the package management quite easy: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/doc/languages-f...
For example,
```
- NixOS/nixpkgs: There isn't a clear canonical way to refer to a specific package
-
NixOS Is Not Reproducible
Yes, Nix doesn't actually ensure that the builds are deterministic. In fact it works just fine if they aren't. There are packages in nixpkgs that aren't reproducible: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aiss...
-
The xz attack shell script
I'm not familiar with Bazel, but Nix in it's current form wouldn't have solved this attack. First of all, the standard mkDerivation function calls the same configure; make; make install process that made this attack possible. Nixpkgs regularly pulls in external resources (fetchUrl and friends) that are equally vulnerable to a poisoned release tarball. Checkout the comment on the current xz entry in nixpkgs https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/pkgs/tools/comp...
-
Debian Git Monorepo
NixOS uses a monorepo and I think everyone's love it.
I love being able to easily grep through all the packages source code and there's regularly PRs that harmonizes conventions across many packages.
Nixpkgs doesn't include the packaged software source code, so it's a lot more practical than what Debian is doing.
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs
-
From xz to ibus: more questionable tarballs
In this specific case, nix uses fetchFromGitHub to download the source archive, which are generated by GitHub for the specified revision[1]. Arch seems to just download the tarball from the releases page[2].
[1]: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/3c2fdd0a4e6396fc310a6e...
[2]: https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/ib...
What are some alternatives?
U-2-Net - The code for our newly accepted paper in Pattern Recognition 2020: "U^2-Net: Going Deeper with Nested U-Structure for Salient Object Detection."
asdf - Extendable version manager with support for Ruby, Node.js, Elixir, Erlang & more
TorchGA - Train PyTorch Models using the Genetic Algorithm with PyGAD
Home Manager using Nix - Manage a user environment using Nix [maintainer=@rycee]
QualityScaler - QualityScaler - image/video deeplearning upscaling for any GPU
git-lfs - Git extension for versioning large files
transparent-background - This is a background removing tool powered by InSPyReNet (ACCV 2022)
easyeffects - Limiter, compressor, convolver, equalizer and auto volume and many other plugins for PipeWire applications
mmsegmentation - OpenMMLab Semantic Segmentation Toolbox and Benchmark.
spack - A flexible package manager that supports multiple versions, configurations, platforms, and compilers.
Visual Studio Code - Visual Studio Code
waydroid - Waydroid uses a container-based approach to boot a full Android system on a regular GNU/Linux system like Ubuntu.