ikos
miri
ikos | miri | |
---|---|---|
14 | 122 | |
1,986 | 3,973 | |
0.5% | 2.7% | |
7.5 | 10.0 | |
about 1 month ago | 1 day ago | |
C++ | Rust | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
ikos
- Static analyzer IKOS 3.2 Released
- Static analyzer IKOS 3.2-rc1 published – Request for testers
-
The NSA advises move to memory-safe languages
I beg to differ: there are a few tools which are comparable.
Frama-C (https://www.frama-c.com) is an open source framework that has, among its analyzers, one based on abstract interpretation (https://www.frama-c.com/fc-plugins/eva.html) that is very similar in spirit to Astree.
MOPSA (https://mopsa.lip6.fr) is another open-source project (albeit more recent, and in a more "academic" stage) that also provides abstract interpretation to analyze C programs for flaws.
NASA also released IKOS (https://github.com/NASA-SW-VnV/ikos), on the same vein.
Of course they lack the polish of a product which costs tens of thousands of euros per license, but they are open source, and their purpose is the same: to ensure code safety via formal methods, in particular abstract interpretation.
It is possible to get these tools to analyze some code and generate no complaints, which ensures absence of several kinds of problems, such as memory safety issues.
Then again, it's hard to know exactly how much they differ from Astree, since you need a license to compare them, and I don't even know if you are allowed to publish such comparisons.
-
Does anyone use IKOS for static analysis?
I've been playing around with running IKOS (https://github.com/NASA-SW-VnV/ikos), it sounds very cool but doesn't seem to be super well maintained. I've managed to compile my project to llvm bit-code and run the IKSO on it, but the actual analysis seems to be buggy. There are open issues for the problems I encountered, but the make the analysis pretty useless (it thinks most functions are unreachable).
- Astrée Static Analyzer for C and C++
-
Checked C
> https://www.absint.com/astree/index.htm
This looks interesting. It's based on abstract interpretation which is more or less the most powerful approach for imperative code available. (Because the way it works it's likely slow as hell though, I guess).
But it's closed source. One of this kind of products where you need to asks for the price… I think we all know what this means: It'll be laughably expensive.
I don't see any offer for OpenSource projects frankly.
> https://github.com/NASA-SW-VnV/ikos
Also abstract interpretation based. Looks less polished than the first one at first glance.
It's under some questionable license. According to OSI it's OpenSource. According to the FSF it's not. (The FSF argument sounds strong. They're right in my opinion. This NASA license does not look like OpenSource).
But an OpenSource project could use it for free I assume.
> https://github.com/static-analysis-engineering/CodeHawk-C
Much more constrained in scope than the other ones. But looks a little bit "too academic" imho: Uses its own C parser and such.
At least it's OpenSource under MIT license.
Thanks for the links either way! Good to know about some tools in case one would need them at some point.
> I have planned to try using them on OpenZFS for a while, but I am still busy reviewing and fixing reports made by conventional static analyzers.
Stupid question about usual C development practices (as I don't have much contact with that):
Aren't analyzers today part of the build pipeline form the get go? Especially as C is known to be full of booby traps.
Imho it shouldn't be even possible to push anything that has issues discovered by tools.
This should be the lowest barrier as most code analyzers are at most able to spot quite obvious problems (the commercial one above is likely an exception to this "rule"). When even the usual "stupid analyzer" sees issues than the code is very likely in a very bad shape.
Adding such tools later on in the development is like activating warnings post factum: You'll get drowned in issues.
Especially in such critical domains as file-systems I would actually expect that the developers are using "the best tools money can buy" (or at least the best OpenSource tools available).
"Still fixing bugs found by some code analyzer" doesn't sound like someone should have much trust with their data in something like ZFS, to be honest… The statement sounds actually quite scary to me.
- NSA Cybersecurity Information Sheet remarks on C and C++.
-
IKOS: Static analyzer for C/C++ based on the theory of Abstract Interpretation
They have very unusual license which I have never seen before: https://github.com/NASA-SW-VnV/ikos/blob/master/LICENSE.txt
Is anyone familiar with it? Is it OSI certified? (it's not on the OSI's site).
- Is there a project like MIRI but for C++
-
(x-post) Why static analysis on C projects is not widespread already?
Yeah there are tools that require adding contracts as comments. But again, there are also friction-less tools that don't require any changes (for example a NASA one).
miri
-
Rust: Box Is a Unique Type
>While we are many missing language features away from this being the case, the noalias case is also magic descended upon box itself, with no user code ever having access to it.
I'm not sure why the author thinks there's magic behind Box. Box is not a special case of `noalias`. Run this snippet with miri and you'll see the same issue: https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&editio...
`Box` _does_ have an expectation that its inner pointer is not aliased to another Box (even if used for readonly operations). See: https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/1800#issuecomment-8...)
-
Bytecode VMs in Surprising Places
Miri [0] is an interpreter for the mid-level intermediate representation (MIR) generated by the Rust compiler. MIR is input for more processing steps of the compiler. However miri also runs MIR directly. This means miri is a VM. Of course it's not a bytecode VM, because MIR is not a bytecode AFAIK. I still think that miri is a interesting example.
And why does miri exist?
It is a lot slower. However it can check for some undefined behavior.
[0]: https://github.com/rust-lang/miri
-
RFC: Rust Has Provenance
Provenance is a dynamic property of pointer values. The actual underlying rules that a program must follow, even when using raw pointers and `unsafe`, are written in terms of provenance. Miri (https://github.com/rust-lang/miri) represents provenance as an actual value stored alongside each pointer's address, so it can check for violations of these rules.
Lifetimes are a static approximation of provenance. They are erased after being validated by the borrow checker, and do not exist in Miri or have any impact on what transformations the optimizer may perform. In other words, the provenance rules allow a superset of what the borrow checker allows.
- Mir: Strongly typed IR to implement fast and lightweight interpreters and JITs
-
Running rustc in a browser
There has been discussion of doing this with MIRI, which would be easier than all of rustc.
-
Piecemeal dropping of struct members causes UB? (Miri)
This issue has been fixed: https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/2964
- Erroneous UB Error with Miri?
-
I've incidentally created one of the fastest bounded MPSC queue
Actually, I've done more advanced tests with MIRI (see https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/2920 for example) which allowed me to fix some issues. I've also made the code compatible with loom, but I didn't found the time yet to write and execute loom tests. That's on the TODO-list, and I need to track it with an issue too.
-
Interested in "secure programming languages", both theory and practice but mostly practice, where do I start?
He is one of the big brains behind Miri, which is a interpreter that runs on the MIR (compiler representation between human code and asm/machine code) and detects undefined behavior. Super useful tool for language safety, pretty interesting on its own.
-
Formal verification for unsafe code?
I would also run your tests in Miri (https://github.com/rust-lang/miri) to try to cover more bases.
What are some alternatives?
Triton - Triton is a dynamic binary analysis library. Build your own program analysis tools, automate your reverse engineering, perform software verification or just emulate code.
cons-list - Singly-linked list implementation in Rust
ardupilot - ArduPlane, ArduCopter, ArduRover, ArduSub source
sanitizers - AddressSanitizer, ThreadSanitizer, MemorySanitizer
IntegerAbsoluteDifferenceCpp - Computing the difference between two integer values in C++. Turns out this isn't trivial.
rust - Empowering everyone to build reliable and efficient software.
cppbestpractices - Collaborative Collection of C++ Best Practices. This online resource is part of Jason Turner's collection of C++ Best Practices resources. See README.md for more information.
Rust-Full-Stack - Rust projects here are easy to use. There are blog posts for them also.
codechecker - CodeChecker is an analyzer tooling, defect database and viewer extension for the Clang Static Analyzer and Clang Tidy
rfcs - RFCs for changes to Rust
z3 - The Z3 Theorem Prover
nomicon - The Dark Arts of Advanced and Unsafe Rust Programming