vimConfig VS dotfiles

Mostly shell hackery and a bunch of more convenient selection, copy and paste functionality plus extensive documentation like the (supposedly) undocumented line selection operator g_ https://github.com/matu3ba/dotfiles/

I am relative satisfied with mine, although I still dont have a working solution for (vendored) project search and custom sources on keypress for completion is also missing (command completion breaks C-l/Tab for file completion): https://github.com/matu3ba/dotfiles/tree/master/.config/nvim

My config consists mostly of documentation, where you can take a look. I have a plugin as git dir I do include for company stuff, because of network shenanigans packer can not handle. https://github.com/matu3ba/dotfiles

You can see my dotfiles here https://github.com/matu3ba/dotfiles/tree/master/.config/nvim

Otherwise, you can check my setup, but I did not setup snippets yet https://github.com/matu3ba/dotfiles

Thats how it works. You could reduce the amount of plugins or document them for quick lookup. I do this extensively in my dotfiles https://github.com/matu3ba/dotfiles/blob/master/.config/nvim/lua/my_packer.lua

For my config I did write a pile of notes of the default keybindings because I found no good and dense note collection on (all) default keybindings and Vim+Neovim hardcodes them with only an annoying way to search exact the exact keybinding. https://github.com/matu3ba/dotfiles/tree/master/.config/nvim

If you want a more minimal example for explanation, you can check my cmake template: https://github.com/matu3ba/dotfiles/blob/master/templates/CMakeList.txt

I find this cleaner to do in lua without vimscript calls, see here.