icecream VS siad

Related

https://github.com/icecc/icecream - another option that does what distcc does, but aimed at a somewhat different use case.

https://ccache.dev/ - a similar idea but provides caching of build outputs instead of distributing builds. You can use it together with distcc to achieve even better performance.

Of course! The github readme provides a lot of info - https://github.com/icecc/icecream

If you like distcc, did you ever give icecc a try?

https://github.com/icecc/icecream

I never had the time to set it up properly, but by the looks of it, it should be even better.

I would like to have a icecc setup I can vpn into. It seems that with normal configs the clients can talk to the scheduler, but the scheduler cant connect to the clients as it tries to connect to the device running the openvpn server not the one behind it. How could I make my openvpn clients appear almost as physical devices on the network, with unique IP's that local devices can connect to; or if that is unnecessary how could I solve this?

Glad to see a new release on this! I've read worrying news about the state of icecc, and the followup uncertain news on sccache, so I hope at least some part of the tooling is in a good shape.

I always wanted to try to use cmake-conan so I could let Conan grab all packages but have a neat cmake script being in charge of what gets built when. Also, this would allow me to easily switch between CMake fetchcontent and Conan packages that may or may not be stashed automatically on a local Artifactory server. Secondly, since now all build requirements are stashed on a server and binary reproducible, you could concider adding icecream and ccache into the mix. (Try running a node one of your buildservers for massive speadups with icecream) This however does require a reproducible build environment (by configure script) which conan again is really good in.

For example, decentralized data storage projects like Filecoin, Arweave, and Sia posted 50-100% user growth, providing blockchain-powered alternatives to AWS, Google Cloud, and Dropbox for distributed app data security.

Sia - A decentralized data storage platform where the proof of work helps maintain the network and provide storage services.

Our site: https://sia.tech/ Blockchain explorer: https://explore.sia.tech/ How to get Siacoins: https://sia.tech/community-ecosystem?software=exchanges#software The Sia Foundation team: https://sia.tech/about-sia-foundation The Sia Grants Program: https://forum.sia.tech/c/foundation/grants/8 Sia docs: https://docs.sia.tech

Sia

If I'm following correctly, I believe this is basically what Sia does, although not optimized to be used directly as a media server (or maybe it could?).

https://sia.tech/

Not sure what you aught to do, but I will say the 2 projects Im paying attention to are https://www.helium.com/mine and https://sia.tech/

For consumer storage, Sia, Storj, and Vult (on Züs) can be good options since they are architecturally lower cost because of the erasure code technology. But for enterprise storage, among the available platforms, there isn’t a direct competitor to AWS S3 except for Zus, and archive storage, Filecoin is the best alternative, and for consumer storage, Storj, Sia, and Züs offer better options for fast retrieval times.

As long as your needs are not beyond a TB, you can always consider something that does not require an actual "login" or a national currency, such as using SIAcoin (https://sia.tech). The cost for a terabyte hosted in two places often will cost you under the equivalent of $6-8 per month. It takes getting used to, but since it is blockchain based, it might even be possible for you to mine the means of paying for your cloud storage if what you actually need hosted is low enough.

SiaCoin which is the utility token for the Sia ecosystem https://sia.tech/