i-use-arch-btw VS manjarno

In this post, we'll work with the Pro version on Arch Linux (I use Arch, btw) to cover as many of the features as possible.

a better language is I use Arch btw:

I do love the 'I use Arch BTW' Meme. And I also found this to be interesting. Not sure what to make of it yet. Not sure if I even want to put that on my machine. Looks a little untrustworthy without reading the code. :)

Well, just use I use Arch btw, the best programming language while using arch linux os. I use arch btw

It's not a ready distro, you write it yourself using I use arch BTW.

I use arch btw

I don't know how much up to date it is, but https://github.com/vizs/manjarno

Almost all distros would run fine on that sort of hardware. If you're coming from Windows, I'd say go for something KDE or Cinnamon-based like Fedora KDE/Cinnamon, openSUSE, Mint Cinnamon, Mageia or Kubuntu. I wouldn't use Manjaro, the people behind it don't seem very trustworthy.

Here are a couple of reasons - The main one, in my opinion is letting their SSL certificates lapse twice - and recommending that users get around it by changing their clocks, which is kind of a nono. There was also a recent scandal about the use of treasury funds

It's not even truly arch based. They maintain their own repo. https://github.com/vizs/manjarno

Manjaro is made by devs that have no clue what they're doing. Delaying packages without checking them is not stable, it's idiotic. They have caused more vulnerabilities than they have solved. Full explanation as to why Manjaro should not be used: https://github.com/vizs/manjarno

Avoid using Manjaro, it's pretty untrustworthy. https://github.com/vizs/manjarno It's much more unstable and prone to problems than Arch or EndeavourOS.

here's a document on why not to choose manjaro. It's outdated but most points are still valid.

No, manjaro LITERALLY isn't arch. https://github.com/vizs/manjarno