hython
hadolint
hython | hadolint | |
---|---|---|
2 | 25 | |
572 | 9,728 | |
- | 0.9% | |
10.0 | 7.3 | |
almost 7 years ago | 2 days ago | |
Haskell | Haskell | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 only | GNU General Public License v3.0 only |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
hython
-
Leaving Haskell Behind
This really resonates with me.
I’ve been using it in a decidedly industrial application for about 1.5 years now. I had some fairly significant experience with it prior (https://github.com/mattgreen/hython).
For the first time in a long time (20 years experience) I’ve needed to learn a significant amount of things. It’s a combo of the domain and the language. It’s rather exhilarating, and also exhausting. Could also be a lot to bite off on with a busy home life too.
Regardless, the language is brilliant. My manager exhorts me to generally write in a top-down manner a lot because Haskell’s flexibility really conveys dev intent well, so think hard about how it should read, and start from there. This is a huge mindset shift from most langs, where you can feel your brain shut off to save cycles as you type “function” over and over. It really feels like it is meant to be write-friendly. Point-free functions are wonderfully terse to write. I joke that TH is my favorite language: a type-checked macro language that lets me write almost anything I want.
And there’s the rub: even with controlled effects via monads, the syntax is still hard for me to scan and read. I don’t know if this comes eventually or what, but this feels like a function of how dense a line could be. I miss early return dearly, and understand why it isn’t a thing (except if you have a MonadZero at hand) but I know it’s a syntactic transformation that won’t make it in. I really miss the amazing Rust LSP. Haskell’s recently lost the ability to flesh out pattern matches due to Haskell internals shifting with 9.x. I still hate and screw up stacking monads. Compile times can be brutal, esp if you hit the lens library.
I really think the community is one of the strongest group of programmers I’ve already seen. I don’t want to belabor this and dwell on the big brain memes, it’s more that they think hard on this stuff and actually push forward, vs just telling each other that web frameworks are rocket science and it’s impossible to do better than what it exists.
Ultimately, Haskell fits like a glove for our domain of program analysis. Beyond that, I’d still be a bit wary. I’m still thirsty for a PL that is essentially OCaml but with a better syntax. But that’s just me.
- Dhall: A Gateway Drug to Haskell
hadolint
-
Cloud Security and Resilience: DevSecOps Tools and Practices
3. Hadolint: https://github.com/hadolint/hadolint Hadolint is a Dockerfile linter that helps you build best practice Docker images, reducing vulnerabilities in your container configurations.
- Dockerfile Linter
-
Writing a Minecraft server from scratch in Bash (2022)
To skip the "move your scripts to standalone files" step some devs don't like, consider something like https://github.com/hadolint/hadolint which runs Shellcheck over inline scripts within Containerfiles.
-
I reduced the size of my Docker image by 40% – Dockerizing shell scripts
This is neat :)
I love going and making containers smaller and faster to build.
I don't know if it's useful for alpine, but adding a --mount=type=cache argument to the RUN command that `apk add`s might shave a few seconds off rebuilds. Probably not worth it, in your case, unless you're invalidating the cached layer often (adding or removing deps, intentionally building without layer caching to ensure you have the latest packages).
Hadolint is another tool worth checking out if you like spending time messing with Dockerfiles: https://github.com/hadolint/hadolint
-
Top 10 common Dockerfile linting issues
With Depot, we make use of two Dockerfile linters, hadolint and a set of Dockerfile linter rules that Semgrep has written to make a bit of a smarter Dockerfile linter.
-
hadolint - Dockerfile linter
# Download hadolint wget https://github.com/hadolint/hadolint/releases/download/v2.12.0/hadolint-Linux-x86_64 # Download SHA256 checksum wget https://github.com/hadolint/hadolint/releases/download/v2.12.0/hadolint-Linux-x86_64.sha256 # Validate the checksum sha256sum -c hadolint-Linux-x86_64.sha256 # Make the file executable chmod + ./hadolint-Linux-x86_64 # Rename the file mv hadolint-Linux-x86_64 hadolint
- Haskell Dockerfile Linter
-
Is adding a USER best practice?
The most common linter I've seen and used it Hadolint, which does: https://github.com/hadolint/hadolint/wiki/DL3002 I didn't bother checking to see if alternatives also support this as well though.
-
Checkmake: Experimental Linter/Analyzer for Makefiles
Some discussion on that here:
https://github.com/koalaman/shellcheck/issues/58
The hadolint project does shell checking for Dockerfiles and it uses shellcheck:
https://github.com/hadolint/hadolint
So the approach is definitely feasible, but you do need a new project and probably it needs to be written in Haskell.
-
Dokter: the doctor for your Dockerfiles
how does this compare to something like hadolint?
What are some alternatives?
trivy - Find vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, secrets, SBOM in containers, Kubernetes, code repositories, clouds and more
dockle - Container Image Linter for Security, Helping build the Best-Practice Docker Image, Easy to start
docker-bench-security - The Docker Bench for Security is a script that checks for dozens of common best-practices around deploying Docker containers in production.
stan - 🕵️ Haskell STatic ANalyser
hlint - Haskell source code suggestions
grype - A vulnerability scanner for container images and filesystems
ormolu - A formatter for Haskell source code
leksah - Haskell IDE
bisect-binary - Tool to determine relevant parts of binary data
podman - Podman: A tool for managing OCI containers and pods.
ShellCheck - ShellCheck, a static analysis tool for shell scripts
dockerfile - Dockerfile best-practices for writing production-worthy Docker images.