langchain VS private-gpt

Langchain and the implementation of Custom Tools also is a great (and very efficient) way to setup a dedicated Q&A (for example for chat purpose) agent.

We're using it via langchain talking to Amazon Bedrock which is hosting Claude 1.x. It's comparable to GPT3.x, not bad. The integration doesn't seem to be fully there though, I think langchain is expecting "Human:" and "AI:", but Claude uses "Assistant:".

https://github.com/hwchase17/langchain/issues/2638

Depending on how much work you want to put into it, you can get started at HuggingFace with their models and datasets, but you'd need compute power, multiple MLOps, etc. I was introduced to the concept in this video, since Google has their Vertex AI tools on Google Cloud, and there's always LangChain but I'm not sure about anything recent.

a documentation chatbot proof of concept using GPT3.5 and LangChain

I encourage everyone to pay attention to the Langchain open-source project and leverage it to achieve tasks that ChatGPT cannot handle.

Yeah I never know where memory goes exactly in langchain, it's not exactly clear all the time. But sure, the main insight I remember is this, take a look at their MULTI_PROMPT_ROUTER_TEMPLATE: https://github.com/hwchase17/langchain/blob/560c4dfc98287da1...

It's a lot of instructions for an LLM, they seem to forget an LLM is an auto-completion machine, and which data it is trained on. Using <<>> for sections is not a normal thing, it's not markdown, which probably the thing read way more often on the internet, instead of open json comments, why not type signatures, instead of so many rules, why not give it examples? It is an autocomplete machine!

They are relying too much on the LLM being smart because they probably only test stuff in GPT-4 and 3.5, but with GPT4All models this prompt was not working at all, so I had to rewrite it, for simple routing, we don't even need json, carying the `next_inputs` here is weird if you don't need it.

So this is my version of it: https://gist.github.com/rogeriochaves/b67676977eebb1936b9b5c...

It's so basic it's dumb, yet it is more powerful, as it does not rely on GPT-4 level intelligence, it's just what I needed

PrivateGPT is a nice tool for this. It's not exactly what you're asking for, but it gets part of the way there.

https://github.com/zylon-ai/private-gpt

Further details available at: https://docs.privategpt.dev/api-reference/api-reference/ingestion

Run https://github.com/imartinez/privateGPT

Then

make ingest /path/to/folder/with/files

Then chat to the LLM.

Done.

Docs: https://docs.privategpt.dev/overview/welcome/quickstart

PrivateGPT repository in case anyone's interested: https://github.com/imartinez/privateGPT . It doesn't seem to be linked from their official website.

I’m preparing a small internal tool for my work to search documents and provide answers (with references), I’m thinking of using GPT4All [0], Danswer [1] and/or privateGPT [2].

The RAG technique is very close to what I have in mind, but I don’t want the LLM to “hallucinate” and generate answers on its own by synthesizing the source documents. As stated by many others, we’re living in interesting times.

[0] https://gpt4all.io/index.html

[1] https://www.danswer.ai/

[2] https://github.com/imartinez/privateGPT

https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/14niv66/using_a...

https://github.com/imartinez/privateGPT

I've been playing around with https://github.com/imartinez/privateGPT and https://github.com/simonw/llm and wanted to create a simple Python package that made it easier to run ChatGPT-like LLMs on your own machine, use them with non-public data, and integrate them into practical applications.

This resulted in Python package I call OnPrem.LLM.

In the documentation, there are examples for how to use it for information extraction, text generation, retrieval-augmented generation (i.e., chatting with documents on your computer), and text-to-code generation: https://amaiya.github.io/onprem/

Enjoy!