huniq VS repo

How does it compare with huniq and runiq?

`sort | uniq` is really slow for this, as it has to sort the entire input first. I use `huniq` which is way faster for this. I'm sure there are many similar options.

https://github.com/koraa/huniq

For better speed, check out https://github.com/koraa/huniq

{ "name": "Some name", "version": "1.0.0", "description": "Some description", "repository": { "type": "git", "url": "git+ssh://[email protected]/user/repo" }, "keywords": [ "some", "keywords" ], "author": "you, of course :)", "license": "MIT I hope", "bugs": { "url": "https://github.com/user/repo/issues" }, "homepage": "https://github.com/user/repo#readme" }

pip3 install repolist repolist -u https://github.com/user/repo

# Fork the Repogit clone https://github.com/user/repo.git# Make changes...# Push to the repositorygit push origin master

An HTTPS URL like https://github.com/user/repo.git

# Git Command examples $ git init $ git clone https://github.com/user/repo.git $ git add README.md $ git commit -m "Update README" $ git push origin master

_, err: = git.plainclone ("/tmp/myrepo", false y git.cloneOptions { URL: "https://github.com/user/repo", })

if your repo is https://github.com/user/repo, then run this command

I use https://github.com/user/repo/find/master and it works perfectly, and I only know the structure of a file name, not the actual file name. And this is on a larger repo, 8GB, 14k files, 1500 folders.

git clone https://github.com/user/repo.git # to clone a repository git clone https://github.com/user/repo.git another-repo-name # to clone a repository and give it a different local name

git clone: This command creates a local copy of a remote repository. For example, git clone https://github.com/user/repo.git will create a local copy of the repository located at https://github.com/user/repo.git.