http-extensions VS ietf-reviewtool

Compare http-extensions vs ietf-reviewtool and see what are their differences.

http-extensions

HTTP Extensions in progress (by httpwg)
HTTP ietf httpbis Standards
Source Code
httpwg.org
Suggest alternative
Edit details

ietf-reviewtool

Download and review IETF documents, such as Internet-Drafts or RFCs. (by larseggert)
ietf Rfc i-d internet-draft Review
Source Code
pypi.org
Suggest alternative
Edit details
InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
http-extensions ietf-reviewtool
3 1
403 11
0.5% -
9.5 8.3
2 days ago 9 days ago
Python Python
- GNU General Public License v3.0 only
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

http-extensions

Posts with mentions or reviews of http-extensions. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-11-21.
  • HTTP Message Signatures
    4 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 21 Nov 2021
    I'll take this opportunity to point out that Ed25519 support is an open issue, but no one has stepped up to specify it yet.[0]

    [0] https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1509

  • Signing HTTP Messages (Internet Draft)
    1 project | /r/crypto | 1 Aug 2021
    (If anyone else's first instinct was to question RSA and ECDSA in a spec but no Ed25519, see https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/1509)
  • Defining a new HTTP method: HTTP SEARCH
    1 project | /r/programming | 12 Apr 2021
    SEARCH isn't necessarily the permanent name though, it's just a starting point. There's a difficult compatibility vs good naming debate that's not yet decided. Go join the IETF mailing list/post on GH and add your vote :-)

ietf-reviewtool

Posts with mentions or reviews of ietf-reviewtool. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing http-extensions and ietf-reviewtool you can also consider the following projects:

cert-verifier-js - Javascript library for verifying Blockcerts Certificates

author-tools - Author Tools

http-core - Core HTTP Specifications

terminology - A configuration file for in-solidarity-bot that flags some of the terms in the NIST Technical Series Publications Author Instructions and the IETF's list of problematic terminology.

wg-materials - Agenda, Minutes, Presentations

secure-bookmark - Security critical web apps with Data URL and subressource integrity

dl-4-tsc - Deep Learning for Time Series Classification

base-drafts - Internet-Drafts that make up the base QUIC specification

i-d-template - A template for IETF internet draft git repositories

warehouse - The Python Package Index

PEP 8 Speaks - A GitHub :octocat: app to automatically review Python code style over Pull Requests

http-extensions vs cert-verifier-js ietf-reviewtool vs author-tools http-extensions vs http-core ietf-reviewtool vs terminology http-extensions vs wg-materials ietf-reviewtool vs wg-materials http-extensions vs secure-bookmark ietf-reviewtool vs dl-4-tsc http-extensions vs base-drafts ietf-reviewtool vs i-d-template http-extensions vs warehouse ietf-reviewtool vs PEP 8 Speaks