html2karax VS Rust-CUDA

I have used Nim for personal projects for 6 years now and it continues to surprise me on how well versed it is for many problem domains. I am fond of it's SPA framework, karax https://github.com/karaxnim/karax for which I wrote a translation utility https://github.com/nim-lang-cn/html2karax Latest Nimv2 release candidate has improved in the ergonomics and syntax that affect compilation to js, so I was able to cleanup my webapp's code to be less verbose. On GPU programming there has been a few projects that touch GPU programming, most notably https://github.com/treeform/shady

Check my project that converts a static web page to ready to use karax DSL code:

https://github.com/nim-lang-cn/html2karax

Source code [here](https://github.com/ihawn/RTracer) if anyone is interested in taking a look or giving feedback. As a side question, does anyone have any general advise on getting GPU compute working with rust? I tried [this project](https://github.com/Rust-GPU/Rust-CUDA) but had a bunch of issues (And it doesn't look like an active repo anyways)

You have this https://github.com/Rust-GPU/Rust-CUDA

What I'm trying to do is check out https://github.com/Rust-GPU/Rust-CUDA for a class project.

Be warned, NON_BLOCKING streams do not fully synchronize with sync host to device copies. They are not guaranteed to actually finish by the time they return. Meaning its possible to initiate a copy, then initiate a kernel launch, and have the copy be unfinished by the time the kernel is launched. This caused so many confusing bugs that i personally decided to stop using NON_BLOCKING altogether in rust-cuda. https://github.com/Rust-GPU/Rust-CUDA/issues/15

- Cuda is not doing by FFI linking, instead is compiling CUDA code natively in Rust https://github.com/Rust-GPU/Rust-CUDA and even if it not complete as the C++ SDK is more than a toy

Given your criteria, you might want to consider (modern) C++.

* Fast - in many cases faster than Rust, although the difference is inconsequential relative to Python-to-Rust improvement I guess.

* _Really_ utilize CUDA, OpenCL, Vulcan etc. Specifically, Rust GPU is limited in its supported features, see: https://github.com/Rust-GPU/Rust-CUDA/blob/master/guide/src/... ...

* Host-side use of CUDA is at least as nice, and probably nicer, than what you'll get with Rust. That is, provided you use my own Modern C++ wrappers for the CUDA APIs: https://github.com/eyalroz/cuda-api-wrappers/ :-) ... sorry for the shameless self-plug.

* ... which brings me to another point: Richer offering of libraries for various needs than Rust, for you to possibly utilize.

* Easier to share than Rust. A target system is less likely to have an appropriate version of Rust and the surrounding ecosystem.

There are downsides, of course, but I was just applying your criteria.

Technically, yes. There are crates for OpenCL and CUDA, although official ROCm support does not exist yet.