HoundCI
RubyGems
| HoundCI | RubyGems | |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 25 | |
| 1,943 | 2,294 | |
| 0.2% | 0.1% | |
| 1.2 | 9.8 | |
| about 1 month ago | 6 days ago | |
| Ruby | Ruby | |
| MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
HoundCI
-
OOP vs. services for organizing business logic: is there a third way?
github.com/houndci/hound (14k lines): Automated code review for GitHub PRs.
-
Design Patterns: Query Objects
You can also decide on creating query objects for one specific query each. With this approach, you probably wanna create query objects just for more complicated queries. For instance, check this one from Hound repository:
RubyGems
-
Phlex is the ruby way to build your views
However, let's examine a typical partial, such as the one from the . rubygems.org search show page
- Chrome considers gems to be dangerous?
- Rubygems.org Hacked?
- Rubygems.org marked by Chrome as an “unsafe site”
-
OOP vs. services for organizing business logic: is there a third way?
github.com/rubygems/rubygems.org (26k lines): Where Ruby gems are hosted.
-
RubyGems now requires MFA for owners of top gems
If anyone is looking to do some open source contributions on a mature, production Ruby on Rails site, I highly recommend contributing to the rubygems.org project. The code is extremely clean and the repo is very, very well run.
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems.org
- Rubygems packages found carrying out dependency confusion research
-
Making popular Ruby packages more secure
RubyGems does have gem signing, but it's not widely used.
There's a proposal for a new "one button" approach using sigstore[0].
Other ecosystems are also looking at sigstore too, and a lot of us are cooperating in the OpenSSF Securing Software Repos WG [1]. Package signing is a regular topic of discussion and there are various efforts underway.
Disclosure: I am involved with both of these.
[0] https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems.org/pull/2944
[1] https://github.com/ossf/wg-securing-software-repos
- Due to a bug in the yank action, it was possible for any RubyGems.org user to remove and replace certain gems even if that user was not authorized to do so.
What are some alternatives?
CodeClimate - Code Climate CLI
Bundler
Travis CI.com - Free continuous integration platform for GitHub projects.
gemdiff - Find source repositories for ruby gems. Open, compare, and update outdated gem versions
Gitlab CI - GitLab CE Mirror | Please open new issues in our issue tracker on GitLab.com
Gem in a Box - Really simple rubygem hosting
Codacy
gemstash - A RubyGems.org cache and private gem server
HuBoard - Kanban board for github issues
passwordless - 🗝 Authentication for your Rails app without the icky-ness of passwords
OctoLinker - OctoLinker — Links together, what belongs together
SharpZipLib - #ziplib is a Zip, GZip, Tar and BZip2 library written entirely in C# for the .NET platform.