hope
purescript
Our great sponsors
| hope | purescript | |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 52 | |
| 36 | 8,458 | |
| - | 0.5% | |
| 0.0 | 6.6 | |
| almost 4 years ago | 11 days ago | |
| C | Haskell | |
| GNU General Public License v3.0 only | BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
hope
-
How to implement term rewriting systems?
Hope someone else has a better answer.
-
Functors and Monads For People Who Have Read Too Many "Tutorials"
Let's remember what the point of Haskell is: to be a unified language for research in lazy functional programming, as opposed to having to pick one of half a dozen mutually incompatible lazy functional languages used in research before, the most popular examples being Hope and Miranda. In other words, you should think of Haskell as the Common Lisp of lazy functional programming.
purescript
- Learning Elm by porting a medium-sized web front end from React (2019)
- Ask HN: Interest in a Rust-Inspired Language Compiling to JavaScript?
-
Building React Components Using Unions in TypeScript
Naturally I’d recommend using a better language such as ReScript or Elm or PureScript or F#‘s Fable + Elmish, but “React” is the king right now and people perceive TypeScript as “less risky” for jobs/hiring, so here we are.
-
Is there a better way to do read-only types
Unless you want to switch to https://www.purescript.org/.
-
Why I'm Leaving Elm
PureScript[1][2] seems pretty alive these days. From my relatively small, self-contained experiments, it's a lot more flexible and expressive than Elm at the expense of (maybe?) being a bit harder to learn up-front.
[1]: https://www.purescript.org/
[2]:https://github.com/purescript/purescript
- (strongly typed) functional language compilers running in browser
-
purescript VS purs-eval - a user suggested alternative
2 projects | 2 Mar 2023
- Por que Elm é uma linguagem tão deliciosa?
-
I will die on this hill (curve)
*cough* I mean Purescript.
-
My main beef with Haskell/JS
Assuming this is a PS knock, fwiw this went away a good bit ago: https://github.com/purescript/purescript/releases/tag/v0.14.2
What are some alternatives?
fp-ts - Functional programming in TypeScript
promises-spec - An open standard for sound, interoperable JavaScript promises—by implementers, for implementers.
reason - Simple, fast & type safe code that leverages the JavaScript & OCaml ecosystems
elm-reactor
Elm - Compiler for Elm, a functional language for reliable webapps.
rescript-compiler - The compiler for ReScript.
Idris2 - A purely functional programming language with first class types
liquidhaskell - Liquid Types For Haskell
polysemy - :gemini: higher-order, no-boilerplate monads
stylish-haskell - Haskell code prettifier [Moved to: https://github.com/haskell/stylish-haskell]
haskell-names - Haskell suite library for name resolution