hearthstone-linux VS Info

Furthermore, because you didn't name Distrobox, is it fair to assume that you're not making use of it? Back when I started, I didn't know much about Nix. So my go-to (when a flatpak didn't exist) was to go directly for a distrobox with a custom home folder (at least I could get rid of everything contained within when I felt like it). And I'd argue it has been instrumental in easing the experience until I got more comfortable with how Silverblue is used. Heck, even now I've got a dedicated Arch-distrobox with Wine for the times Bottles fails me. I also just recently made another Arch-distrobox for a native install of HearthStone for some experimentation with getting the Deck Tracker to work in it while all being properly confined (still WIP). I can't remember the amount of times I tried some random stuff in a(n ephemeral) distrobox (like installing cmatrix for the heck of it), get some enjoyment/fulfillment out of it and just continue with my life afterwards. I feel like with Distrobox, you'd have a much easier time on Silverblue. At times you can afford to rethink/relearn your ways to do it more accordance to the 'Silverblue-way'; one-step-at-a-time. But sometimes you can't, or for some reason it just doesn't seem to work. For such cases, instead of reverting back to Workstation, you should instead use Distrobox to get the work done.

i followed this guide https://github.com/0xf4b1/hearthstone-linux, and it worked perfectly for some months, but now whenever i start hearthstone it wont let me log in and im met with this message:

You can easily install it using lutris or you can even install it without using wine/lutris https://github.com/0xf4b1/hearthstone-linux

The OSX version of HearthStone uses the Unity engine, using the Unity/OSX version it is possible to get Hearthstone running on Linux without wine or similar compatibility/virtualization layers.

You actually CAN use decktracker if you install it via lutris contrary to what some people say here. Google arena tracker, works good enough. But here is another issue, I don't know how for others, but for me game might suddenly just get stuck, and moreover you won't be able to get back instantly because battle.net takes so much to launch on lutris. It happens really rare. But when it happens on 10-2 arena run or when you are 2 stars from legend... You could also install it as native game which works absolutely flawlessly, https://github.com/0xf4b1/hearthstone-linux, but here you won't be able to use decktracker ( at least I don't know how, if you know how, I'll be happy know )

There exists a COPR to get the earlier mentioned kernel-hardened package on Fedora. Furthermore, I forgot to mention the hardened_malloc package as (yet another) measure for hardening is offered for Fedora as well. But you might have started to notice a pattern; these (and many other projects) are not ported to openSUSE (or at least not in a way that a mere layman like myself can access them) and this is hurting the legibility of using openSUSE over Fedora. Even if Silverblue doesn't yet provide support for anything I've just mentioned; at some point it will. And at that point, I'm sure that I can get those packages installed easily and go on with my life. Unfortunately, with openSUSE, I just don't know if that ever will be the case. So either I'd have to reinvent the wheel myself, or opt for the easy option....; use Fedora instead. And this is merely just an example of this, for a lot stuff that go beyond the base install you might have difficulty with getting it done on openSUSE. Simply because it's not there yet and it lacks the community to do it for openSUSE. The aforementioned uBlue (a community project) provides a lot of different Desktop Environments to be used with Fedora Silverblue. Unfortunately, with openSUSE Aeon, you're kinda stuck with GNOME (to be fair Kalpa and Greybeard do exist, but use these at your own discretion). Which shouldn't be a problem if you enjoy using GNOME, but what if you don't enjoy using GNOME...