headscale
ztncui
| headscale | ztncui | |
|---|---|---|
| 222 | 10 | |
| 19,696 | 1,464 | |
| - | - | |
| 9.2 | 2.8 | |
| 5 days ago | 8 months ago | |
| Go | JavaScript | |
| BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License | GNU General Public License v3.0 only |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
headscale
-
List of ngrok/Cloudflare Tunnel alternatives and other tunneling software and services. Focus on self-hosting.
headscale - Open source implementation of Tailscale control server. Can be used with Tailscale's official open source client. Written in Go.
-
Building a Managed Service Provider Business With Open Source
Headscale
-
Russia has started indiscriminately blocking all OpenVPN/WireGuard connections
You can always use headscale. https://github.com/juanfont/headscale
-
Securely Accessing Private AWS Resources from GitHub Actions with TailScale
One more thing, you can host Tailscale Control Server yourself if you want, which is a plus.
-
A word of caution about Tailscale
https://github.com/juanfont/headscale not to mention but Tailscale has a very good culture, I’m sure they would give notice if they pull the rug. There are also many alternatives such as Zerotier and more are showing up every day and open source options.
- Is HTTPS necessary?
-
Connecting several hundreds IoT (raspberry pi's) devices with a VPN
How about self-hosted Tailscale, known as Headscale
-
Tailscale Kubernetes Operator
Would be nice if https://github.com/juanfont/headscale can be managed by the Tailscale operator.
-
Mullvad on Tailscale: Privately browse the web
You can run your own "head scale" control server and use their clients with it: https://github.com/juanfont/headscale
Requires a lot more setup, but it is an option. I've been self-hosting headscale for some time and it is quite stable.
-
Netbirdio/netbird: Connect devices into a single private WireGuard mesh network
There's an alternative to tailscale service called headscale https://github.com/juanfont/headscale (CLI only server compatible with official tailscale clients)
ztncui
-
Ask HN: What's the Deal with Tailscale?
> they actively went after third party coordination servers, wherenas I hear headscale mentioned by tailscale employees all the time.
ZeroTier founder here. We never did anything remotely like that, so I'm curious about where you heard that.
We did adjust our licensing to counter people attempting to take the product, slap their own name on it, and monetize it without supporting us, but we are strongly considering going back to a more liberal license in the near future. In any case we didn't "go after" anyone, just limited commercial closed source use in a manner not unlike the AGPL. We never filed any kind of lawsuits about this or anything.
We also regularly promote third party open source products like this:
https://github.com/key-networks/ztncui
We've never had an issue with non-commercial or FOSS usage.
- Battle of (selfhosted) VPNS: Which is the fastest? Wireguard vs Tailscale vs Zerotier vs Nebula vs Netmaker vs Tinc
-
Selfhosted wireguard vs zerotier (or similar) what is best in terms of security
If you have a VPN somewhere, you could also try Nebula (https://www.defined.net/nebula/) or self-host the management server for Tailscale (https://github.com/juanfont/headscale) or zerotier (https://github.com/key-networks/ztncui).
-
Remote Access to HomeLab (Networking)
Disadvantages: Limited to 50 hosts (you can host your own ZeroTier Controller using Ztncui for unlimited hosts: https://github.com/key-networks/ztncui)
-
You should know about using ZeroTier or Tailscale as an easier approach to secure all your connections, while being easier infrastructure-wise than VPN
You can self host a controller of adding/removing devices and all ( https://github.com/key-networks/ztncui ), but it has an upstream connection to their managed services, it’s how the apps and all keep working.
-
Free plan member limit per network or overall?
There are a couple of Options out there that make controlling the controller easier, either through WEB Guis: https://github.com/key-networks/ztncui https://github.com/dec0dOS/zero-ui
- Headscale: Open-source implementation of the Tailscale control server
-
ZeroTier – Global Area Networking
Every zerotier node ships with the CLI network controller, but someone wrote a simple GUI for it and that is on docker.
https://github.com/key-networks/ztncui
-
ZeroUI - ZeroTier Controller Web UI - is a web user interface for a self-hosted ZeroTier network controller. ZTNCUI alternative.
ZeroUI implements controller-specific workarounds that address some existing [issues](https://github.com/zerotier/ZeroTierOne/issues/859). ZTNCUI [does not](https://github.com/key-networks/ztncui/issues/63).
-
Is ZeroTier safe?
You can host your own authorization server. https://github.com/key-networks/ztncui
What are some alternatives?
tailscale - The easiest, most secure way to use WireGuard and 2FA.
zero-ui - ZeroUI - ZeroTier Controller Web UI - is a web user interface for a self-hosted ZeroTier network controller.
Netmaker - Netmaker makes networks with WireGuard. Netmaker automates fast, secure, and distributed virtual networks.
ZeroTier - A Smart Ethernet Switch for Earth
netbird - Connect your devices into a single secure private WireGuard®-based mesh network with SSO/MFA and simple access controls.
MeshMage
nebula-mesh-admin
Nebula - A scalable overlay networking tool with a focus on performance, simplicity and security