hackernews-sauron VS rust-web-framework-comparison

I did the same thing in a hackernews clone, except it is using sauron, instead of yew. I think yew is using trunk, which create and generate a files named with hashes, so it changed everytime the files are built. I use wasm-pack to build the wasm and the glue js file, which doesn't changed every build. So it is easy to just embed and serve them server side.

I can vouch for warp, the experience has been smooth so far, no crashes. The url route might be a bit not intuitive at first, but comes easier the more you use it. Here is a port of hackernews I wrote using all rust stack.

I'm the author of sauron web framework and it has the capability of progressive server-side rendering as demonstrated in one of the examples. There is also a demo app which is a clone of hackernews which is built to be resilient in the event of failure in either the javascript or the server. It is extensively used in svgbob, which has been adopted as plugin for other projects such as asciidoctor and krokio.

There is an example project which demonstrate its fullstack capability.

First is the size. Writing a server-side and client-side program is possible with Rust, and the resulting WASM package will be small enough. At the same time, Microsoft Blazor converts C# code to WASM, but the client delivery has to include the reduced .NET runtime, taking several megabytes for a script. The same is true for GoLang, even with an attempt to reduce the runtime delivery in TinyGo WASM. Developers want to work with their favorite languages, whether it is Java, Kotlin, Dart, C#, F#, Swift, Ruby, Python, C, C++, GoLang, or Rust. These languages produce groups of runtimes. For example, JVM and .NET have many common parts, Ruby and Python are dynamically interpreted at runtime, and all mentioned depend on automatic garbage collection. For smaller WASM packages, browser vendors can include extended runtime implementations, for example, by delivering a general garbage collector as part of WASM. Garbage collection support by WASM is currently in progress: WASM GC, .NET WASM Notes.

I'm currently reading up on Leptos and what looks like its major contender, Dioxus [1] in planning for next project. (acknowledging here that Yew [2] is maybe the OG Rust full stack / frontend framework, but I'm not considering it at this time)

Here's a nice comparison of the Rust frontend frameworks: https://github.com/flosse/rust-web-framework-comparison#fron...

Note that Leptos is interesting because it _does not use a virtual DOM_, unlike Yew and Dioxus which are React-like.

We already write our backend in Rust; why not use it for the whole stack and stop worrying about e.g. the Typescript object falling out of sync with the API struct?

[1] https://github.com/DioxusLabs/dioxus/

I want to push for using rust & wasm for a small experimental project at my job. I have reviewed the rust web frameworks comparison document, I'd be interested in Yew because I'm familiar with React, and I am interested in Sycamore and Leptos because they are recommended for use in Tauri and I'm personally interested in trying Tauri at some point.

Check out https://github.com/flosse/rust-web-framework-comparison for some options.

The web framework comparison is a good start.

This repository has some nice comparison tables for different web libraries and frameworks: https://github.com/flosse/rust-web-framework-comparison