OnBoard VS HOOBS

“Electronic products these days are based on chips with hundreds of connectors. Connecting them can involve hundreds of wires. A PC board is an inexpensive way to connect all the wires at once. When Steve Jobs and I started, with a blue box and then the Apple I and Apple II computers, I did the digital design, connecting hundreds of wires myself on the prototypes. Steve Jobs took the role of getting PC boards made so that we could manufacture sellable products.

After a short while we had outside companies create the PC boards according to my designs. I was extremely proud of one design that far exceeded what had been done before. That was a floppy disk interface card so you could attach a disk and type “Run Checkbook” to run the Checkbook program, rather than finding a cassette tape labeled ‘Checkbook’ and then playing it on a cassette tape player into the computer. I was super proud of my floppy disk controller board, with 8 chips rather than the normal 50 chips.

I wanted the PC board for this floppy disk controller to get done quickly but the company that made our PC boards was busy. So I set up a drafting table with mylar sheets and patterns that I could lay out myself, every night for a couple of weeks. I was in charge of the entire project, PC board and all. I was the last one to leave Apple every night for those weeks.

At the end I had a very tiny number of holes connecting the top of my PC board layout to the bottom. It was a tiny number of holes because I’d planned the layout of where the 8 chips went in order to minimize single crossovers, which required holes. But I then realized that if I’d designed a part to shift bits the other way, like from right to left instead of left to right, everything would work but I’d have fewer holes.

I stripped all my PC board layout and started over, for the next week or two, laying out my PC board according to my new, reversed, design. In the end I had only 5 holes in the PC board connecting from the top to the bottom sides. Nobody would ever know that I’d done that. It was my private perfection.

I realized that, in my head, this PC board represented myself, and that’s how perfect (as can be) I was. When you care, it’s not about money. It’s about yourself and your ability and your desire to do as good a job as possible.

I’m so glad that young people can create things like PC boards online. May your creativity have no limits!”

- Steve Wozniak

This quote is part of Hack Club's Onboard project, where we are funding $100 in PCB manufacturing costs for 1,000 high school students over the next year.

You can learn more at https://hackclub.com/onboard/, see people's projects at https://github.com/hackclub/onboard/, and make a tax-deductible donation at https://bank.hackclub.com/donations/start/onboard (every $150 funds 2-3 projects for a teenager).

I am super green when it comes to linux and all the commands. I tried running commands one by one from this script https://github.com/hoobs-org/HOOBS/blob/main/scripts/pihole-hoobs.sh But i am getting stuck pretty much in the beginning with this: hoobs@hoobs:~ $ rm -rf /etc/profile rm: cannot remove '/etc/profile': Permission denied

Well, that's drastically irritating, as I was told to do just that. https://github.com/hoobs-org/HOOBS/issues/726

I had the same problem, repeatedly. I tried removing and re-added the bridge, clearing the refresh token manually, etc., to no avail. The only thing I found that worked was just to update the whole install, as suggested here: https://github.com/hoobs-org/HOOBS/issues/1614

I dont think you're supposed to go to hoobs.org. The page looks just like the one you're supposed to go to but it is not the same. That is a possibility why your whole shabang didnt show up.

So I downloaded the latest image from https://github.com/hoobs-org/HOOBS/releases which states 4.1 and that it is based on Bullseye. However my version shows as 4.0.71 and still says it’s on Buster. What happened? Had the link not been updated? How do I now get to 4.1/Bullseye without re flashing an image?

I found this issue in github where it says it would "run". But would it actually work?