gunicorn
NGINX Unit
gunicorn | NGINX Unit | |
---|---|---|
17 | 16 | |
9,532 | 5,108 | |
- | 0.9% | |
8.0 | 9.5 | |
7 days ago | 4 days ago | |
Python | C | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | Apache 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
gunicorn
-
Nginx Unit – Universal web app server
I'm hoping so – gunicorn has a long-open pull request that would fix `--reuse-port`, which currently does nothing
https://github.com/benoitc/gunicorn/pull/2938
- SynchronousOnlyOperation from celery task using gevent execution pool on django orm
-
Deploying Django when using python-socketio
However, I'm curious about the best way to deploy, specifically with regard to WSGI. I've tried using the raw eventlet WSGI server (`eventlet.wsgi.server(eventlet.listen(("", 8000)), application)`). I then start it with `python manage.py runserver`. This has worked okay, but I'm unsure about how scalable it is. It seems like the standard stack is Django + Gunicorn + NGINX. Based on `python-socketio` documentation, this should be possible. I tried django + eventlet + gunicorn, but it seems like gunicorn a) [doesn't play nice with eventlet](https://github.com/benoitc/gunicorn/pull/2581) and b) only supports one worker. Gevent + Gunicorn doesn't have this bug, but still only supports one worker. Also, I'm not sure how actively maintained gevent is. So I'm not sure how scalable either Gunicorn + eventlet or Gunicorn + geventlet is as a WSGI server. So I'm not sure if Gunicorn is my best bet, or if it's too limited.
- The Django ecosystem is not so good
-
3 cool project ideas for Python programmers
For building your API, I recommend using the Flask library. It is very beginner-friendly, and you will be able to build a simple API in a matter of minutes! Keep in mind that, for a more serious project, you should definitely use something like gunicorn to run you API as a production server.
-
Django 4.1 Released
Interesting looks like it might actually be a python bug. Somehow just changing from sys.exit(0) -> os._exit(0) apparently fixes it.
https://github.com/benoitc/gunicorn/pull/2820
-
Serverless Templates for AWS and Python
The cool thing is that you can easily migrate your WSGI- application such as Flask, Django, or Gunicorn to AWS.
-
Scope of database threads + connections + sessions
Yeah, that's kind of the impression I was getting. I stumbled across a github issue for gunicorn along these lines.
-
Running Django with Gunicorn - Best Practice
Taking a glimpse at gunicorn's code it looks like they pretty much all do the same: 2. seems to be creating a wsgi app using django's internals, and 3. uses 2.
NGINX Unit
- Litestar – powerful, flexible, and highly performant Python ASGI framework
-
Performance benchmark of PHP runtimes
Nginx Unit application server.
- Nginx Unit: Universal Web App Server
-
Nginx Unit – Universal web app server
This is great to read! Thanks for all the great input!
I check the comments next week and make sure to address the issues / ideas mentioned. If you don’t mind feel free to drop a comment here as well with your ideas / needs. https://github.com/nginx/unit/issues/945
I will work on a compression between Nginx and Unit to close this gap in our documentation.
- Universal Web App Server
-
h5ai gallery alternative for nginx
You could try running h5ai with NGINX UNIT.
-
Which reverse proxy are you using?
nginx, but nginx-unit looks very interesting. I might switch a few docker containers to use it before trying to use it natively.
- Universal Web App Server – Nginx Unit
-
Nginx front / Nginx Unit-PHP Back
unix:/filesocketheadache (problems) verses unix:@abstractsocketmagic (problem solved)
-
Easy to use docker-container for your applications
Try Nginx Unit to get away from the php-fpm complexity. It runs on http by default so it's super easy to spin up and access by itself (no need for an extra http server) or behind another http gateway as a simple proxy.
What are some alternatives?
waitress - Waitress - A WSGI server for Python 3
uvicorn - An ASGI web server, for Python. 🦄
Werkzeug - The comprehensive WSGI web application library.
Caddy - Fast and extensible multi-platform HTTP/1-2-3 web server with automatic HTTPS
bjoern - A screamingly fast Python 2/3 WSGI server written in C.
Nginx Proxy Manager - Docker container for managing Nginx proxy hosts with a simple, powerful interface
uwsgi - Official uWSGI docs, examples, tutorials, tips and tricks
Traefik-v2-examples - Traefik v2 guide by examples
meinheld - Meinheld is a high performance asynchronous WSGI Web Server (based on picoev)
filemanager - 📂 Web File Browser
hypercorn - Hypercorn is an ASGI and WSGI Server based on Hyper libraries and inspired by Gunicorn.
snunit - Scala Native HTTP server based on NGINX Unit